Two of the worst examples of shoddy, irresponsible journalism related to global warming – and journalism in general – that I’ve ever seen have unfortunately come in the past month in the Science section of the New York Times. On February 13, libertarian opinion columnist John Tierney used an article ostensibly about Richard Branson’s $25 million carbon sequestration challenge to launch a myopic attack on Al Gore based on the fact that global warming may unfold over the entire next century. You can’t tell from the internet version, but the content on Branson was on the front page and the attack on Al Gore began, suspiciously, right behind the fold and had nothing to do with Branson’s challenge.
Tomorrow morning the Science section will feature an article by William Broad titled “From a Rapt Audience, a Call to Cool the Hype.” The storyline is very simple and familiar: some scientists say Al Gore is exaggerating his claims about global warming, some scientists say he is exaggerating them not so much, actually Al Gore is conveying everything fairly accurately and fully understands the science, but again folks, this reporter found someone who would say he’s exaggerating. Byline March 13, 2007, but it might as well be a reprint from March 13, 1992. The Al Gore-as-Ozone-Man thing… it’s so fifteen years ago. This article was irresponsibly bad for three reasons, outlined below the jump. Why is this relevant to a youth blog? Because the New York Times owes us more than to treat the biggest public policy issue of our century as a gossip-fest.
Continue reading ‘Breaking News: One Time I Heard This One Scientist Guy Say…’
Another day, another study about global warming,
Remember those big concerts about a year ago called