The short version of the story goes something like this: over the weekend, Senator Graham said he’d be removing his name from the draft US climate legislation, originally slated to be released this week, he was supposed to co-sponsor with Senator Lieberman and Senator Kerry. On its surface, his withdrawal stemmed from concerns that Democratic leadership wanted the Senate to move ahead on immigration before taking on the climate issue. I won’t go into the situation in detail, in part because you can read about it elsewhere, and in part because the story’s changing minute-to-minute– surely even since I started this blog post. In today’s press alone the mess has been blamed on any number of factors, from partisan bullying to media-fueled misunderstandings to the political calculations of re-election seeking Majority Leader Harry Reid.
In any case, the whole debacle was regarded as very bad news indeed for an already shaky Senate climate bill. So upon hearing Saturday’s news, climate organizations and advocates here inside the Beltway did what most DC pros would do faced with the latest legislative melodrama: they scrapped their weekend plans (or pulled out the red pens to update their Earth Day Climate Rally speeches) and hopped back on the phones to their political strategists and Senate champions, whipped out their dial-ins and their drawing boards, tried to figure out how to break the news gently to their members, Facebooked and Tweeted their discontent, probably did a considerable amount of drowning their sorrows, and hunkered down to contemplate the maybes:
Maybe Graham’s name will go back on the bill. Maybe climate will come to the Senate floor before immigration, after all. Maybe it was all just one big misunderstanding. Maybe…
Maybe it’s irrelevant.
Continue reading ‘The choice that won’t change the world, and the one that might’