<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protecting Oregon from a New Palomar Pipeline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2011/05/26/protecting-oregon-from-a-new-palomar-pipeline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2011/05/26/protecting-oregon-from-a-new-palomar-pipeline/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickengelfried</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2011/05/26/protecting-oregon-from-a-new-palomar-pipeline/#comment-97038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickengelfried]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 02:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=23696#comment-97038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bill,

I guess you think that since Oregon has high unemployment, we should automatically be glad for whatever bone polluting industries are willing to toss our way.  In actual fact, the Palomar Pipeline would destroy more jobs in the farming, forestry, and fishing industries than it creates in largely temporary construction jobs.  Meanwhile it would disturb our natural areas and increase our dependence on a foreign fossil fuel.  Maybe that sounds like a good deal to you, but it sure doesn&#039;t to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,</p>
<p>I guess you think that since Oregon has high unemployment, we should automatically be glad for whatever bone polluting industries are willing to toss our way.  In actual fact, the Palomar Pipeline would destroy more jobs in the farming, forestry, and fishing industries than it creates in largely temporary construction jobs.  Meanwhile it would disturb our natural areas and increase our dependence on a foreign fossil fuel.  Maybe that sounds like a good deal to you, but it sure doesn&#8217;t to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill M</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2011/05/26/protecting-oregon-from-a-new-palomar-pipeline/#comment-97036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 13:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=23696#comment-97036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m laughing at the Luddites who are turning down jobs and revenue in a state with chronic high unemployment, a budget crisis and oppressive taxes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m laughing at the Luddites who are turning down jobs and revenue in a state with chronic high unemployment, a budget crisis and oppressive taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
