<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tracing Coal Exports&#8217; Deadly Impacts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2011/04/24/tracing-coal-exports-deadly-impacts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2011/04/24/tracing-coal-exports-deadly-impacts/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coal Train Visits Bank of America and Wells Fargo &#171; It&#8217;s Getting Hot In Here</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2011/04/24/tracing-coal-exports-deadly-impacts/#comment-96955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coal Train Visits Bank of America and Wells Fargo &#171; It&#8217;s Getting Hot In Here]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 19:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=23341#comment-96955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in the United States.  Along with Austrialia-based Ambre Energy, Arch is responsible for  a proposed coal export terminal on the Columbia River which would send tens of millions of tons of coal abroad each year through a port in Longview, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the United States.  Along with Austrialia-based Ambre Energy, Arch is responsible for  a proposed coal export terminal on the Columbia River which would send tens of millions of tons of coal abroad each year through a port in Longview, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Going to Jail for Climate Justice is More than a Responsibility: A Closer Look at Our Movement’s Tactics &#171; It&#8217;s Getting Hot In Here</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2011/04/24/tracing-coal-exports-deadly-impacts/#comment-96827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Going to Jail for Climate Justice is More than a Responsibility: A Closer Look at Our Movement’s Tactics &#171; It&#8217;s Getting Hot In Here]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 19:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=23341#comment-96827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] like it were to end U.S. consumption of fossil fuels today, we would still have the problem of dirty energy exports, which are growing in volume from U.S. extractors.  Even this is an ideal situation.  The fact of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like it were to end U.S. consumption of fossil fuels today, we would still have the problem of dirty energy exports, which are growing in volume from U.S. extractors.  Even this is an ideal situation.  The fact of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Going to Jail for Climate Justice is More than a Responsibility: A Closer Look at Our Movement’s Tactics &#187; Rainforest Action Network Blog</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2011/04/24/tracing-coal-exports-deadly-impacts/#comment-96799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Going to Jail for Climate Justice is More than a Responsibility: A Closer Look at Our Movement’s Tactics &#187; Rainforest Action Network Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 22:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=23341#comment-96799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] like it were to end U.S. consumption of fossil fuels today, we would still have the problem of dirty energy exports, which are growing in volume from U.S. extractors. But the fact of the matter is we continue to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like it were to end U.S. consumption of fossil fuels today, we would still have the problem of dirty energy exports, which are growing in volume from U.S. extractors. But the fact of the matter is we continue to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickengelfried</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2011/04/24/tracing-coal-exports-deadly-impacts/#comment-96759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickengelfried]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=23341#comment-96759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Stan,

As a matter of fact, we already have technology that could meet this country&#039;s energy needs without coal power; the problem is the extremely powerful fossil fuel lobby is determined to see these technologies never become as widespread as they could.  There are other ways of generating electricity besides coal and nuclear power, and other countries are already deploying them much faster than us.  Scotland is set to run on 100% renewable power by 2025: are you saying the United States is so technologically backward that we can&#039;t keep up?  I have a little more faith in our engineers and scientists.

Sadly, whether you realize it or not the coal plants you live near are most likely polluting your community; if not it&#039;s simply because the prevalent winds blow the pollution elsewhere.  Coal plants emit mercury, lead, arsenic, and a host of other potentially deadly chemicals. Like radiation from a nuclear accident, the effects of these compounds can remain invisible for years.  However that shouldn&#039;t tempt you into a false sense of complacency.

Finally I certainly have a great and abiding respect for the brave workers in our nation&#039;s coal mines.  That&#039;s why I wish they didn&#039;t have to risk their lives every day, doing one of the country&#039;s most dangerous jobs.  Just last year 29 workers died in a coal mine owned by Massey Energy.  Companies like Massey, Arch, and Peabody don&#039;t have our country&#039;s best interests at heart - if they did, would they be lobbying Congress to weaken the Clean Air Act and other environmental laws?

The tired old argument that &quot;the lights will go out if we stop burning coal&quot; (which, believe it or not, I have heard before) is a vast over-simplification.  We have the technology to generate energy in ways that are safer, cleaner, and better than burning coal.  Now let&#039;s make use of that know-how.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stan,</p>
<p>As a matter of fact, we already have technology that could meet this country&#8217;s energy needs without coal power; the problem is the extremely powerful fossil fuel lobby is determined to see these technologies never become as widespread as they could.  There are other ways of generating electricity besides coal and nuclear power, and other countries are already deploying them much faster than us.  Scotland is set to run on 100% renewable power by 2025: are you saying the United States is so technologically backward that we can&#8217;t keep up?  I have a little more faith in our engineers and scientists.</p>
<p>Sadly, whether you realize it or not the coal plants you live near are most likely polluting your community; if not it&#8217;s simply because the prevalent winds blow the pollution elsewhere.  Coal plants emit mercury, lead, arsenic, and a host of other potentially deadly chemicals. Like radiation from a nuclear accident, the effects of these compounds can remain invisible for years.  However that shouldn&#8217;t tempt you into a false sense of complacency.</p>
<p>Finally I certainly have a great and abiding respect for the brave workers in our nation&#8217;s coal mines.  That&#8217;s why I wish they didn&#8217;t have to risk their lives every day, doing one of the country&#8217;s most dangerous jobs.  Just last year 29 workers died in a coal mine owned by Massey Energy.  Companies like Massey, Arch, and Peabody don&#8217;t have our country&#8217;s best interests at heart &#8211; if they did, would they be lobbying Congress to weaken the Clean Air Act and other environmental laws?</p>
<p>The tired old argument that &#8220;the lights will go out if we stop burning coal&#8221; (which, believe it or not, I have heard before) is a vast over-simplification.  We have the technology to generate energy in ways that are safer, cleaner, and better than burning coal.  Now let&#8217;s make use of that know-how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2011/04/24/tracing-coal-exports-deadly-impacts/#comment-96753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 07:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=23341#comment-96753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you all have great ideas. Just like california. They dont want any power coal powered plants there. Well I live a couple states away, and live by 4 coal powered units. Everytime someone in california turns n there lights they are getting the power from Utah. 75% of the power made here is sent to them. and Who knows where else. So if they dont want the coal or the plants I say shut off there power and let them go nuculear. That seems to be working out all over for the rest of the world. generating waste that will last for millons of years and we dont even know how to store it yet. (savely). The power companies have put everything they have been ask to do to make the coal plants burn cleaner and more efficant. We do not have polution here. The wildlife and and farms prosper fine right next to the plants. So maybe we should be thankful for them men that go under those mountains everyday and risk there lives and die sometimes, just so that all of you can have lights on when you get up in the middle of the night. I guess we could just pull the plug on all the coal powered plants and shut down all the mines and go back to wood stoves and kerosene lamps. How about we develop the technology to light up this country and the steel mills and the cement plants and then we can work at putting all the coal miners and power plant workers that have worked so hard all these years to keep americas lights on out of work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you all have great ideas. Just like california. They dont want any power coal powered plants there. Well I live a couple states away, and live by 4 coal powered units. Everytime someone in california turns n there lights they are getting the power from Utah. 75% of the power made here is sent to them. and Who knows where else. So if they dont want the coal or the plants I say shut off there power and let them go nuculear. That seems to be working out all over for the rest of the world. generating waste that will last for millons of years and we dont even know how to store it yet. (savely). The power companies have put everything they have been ask to do to make the coal plants burn cleaner and more efficant. We do not have polution here. The wildlife and and farms prosper fine right next to the plants. So maybe we should be thankful for them men that go under those mountains everyday and risk there lives and die sometimes, just so that all of you can have lights on when you get up in the middle of the night. I guess we could just pull the plug on all the coal powered plants and shut down all the mines and go back to wood stoves and kerosene lamps. How about we develop the technology to light up this country and the steel mills and the cement plants and then we can work at putting all the coal miners and power plant workers that have worked so hard all these years to keep americas lights on out of work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
