Second Spill in the Gulf: State Dept. Delays Tar Sands Decision

Today, emergency response teams in the gulf are torn between two disasters: the ongoing cleanup of the BP disaster and a new oil geyser spewing into the Gulf near Jefferson Parish, LA. In Michigan, teams are still working to contain a spill from a ruptured pipe that threatens the Kalamazoo River. Horrifying images are emerging from China, where an emergency worker nearly drowned in oil while working to contain a spill that now covers over 150 square miles off the coast of China.

At the same time as these pipelines are spewing toxic oil into bodies of water around the country and around the globe, the State Department has pushed back its decision on permitting the Keystone XL project, a huge pipeline carrying extraordinarily toxic tar sands oil from Canada down to the gulf coast. On its proposed 1700-mile path, this pipe crosses over numerous bodies of water and productive farmland, and, were a spill to occur, could contaminate the largest aquifer in the Great Plains.

This week, the EPA released comments on the project’s draft environmental impact statement, compiled by the State Department. In these comments, the EPA highlights the document’s inadequate consideration of pipeline safety and spill response issues.

Since tar sands oil by itself is too thick to be transported by pipeline, it must be diluted with a mixture of chemicals. The EPA notes that these chemicals “may negatively impact the efficacy of traditional floating oil spill response equipment or response strategies” and further criticizes the fact that the EIS “does not emphasize the primary effect of an oil spill, i.e., acute toxicity to the aquatic environment.” In addition, the EPA voices concern that the higher quantity of sulfur in all tar sands oil will result in increased corrosion of the pipeline walls, making a spill more likely to occur.

The EPA also faults the State Department’s report for failing to include an Emergency Response Plan. Given the oil industry’s recent track record of pipeline safety and their demonstrated lack of preparedness to deal with spills, it would be unconscionable to allow this pipeline, with all its additional environmental and safety concerns, to go forward without a comprehensive, publicly distributed Emergency Response Plan.

In making these comments, the EPA and Administrator Lisa Jackson stand as a model of government doing its job to respond to the risks of dirty fossil fuels to our environment and to our public health. The State Department, which has just announced that it will not make a final decision on the Keystone XL project until after a final Environmental Impact Statement is released, must address all of EPA’s concerns within the revised document. Any project that could cause yet another catastrophic, toxic spill is clearly not in our national interest.

3 Responses to “Second Spill in the Gulf: State Dept. Delays Tar Sands Decision”


  1. 1 Matt7195 Jul 28th, 2010 at 4:35 pm

    WHY ISN’T THIS NEW SPILL IN THE GULF BEING REPORTED!!!????!!

    None of the major news organizations have any reports or headlines about the Jefferson Parish accident! They’re reporting about the poor response by Coast Guard Firefighters to Deepwater Horizon. This is absurd! How can we ever expect change when the news is so one-sided?

  2. 2 The Destructionist Jul 29th, 2010 at 8:14 pm

    On Monday night (July 26) an oil pipeline – owned by Enbridge Energy Inc. – burst and spilled over 1,000,000+ gallons of crude into the Kalamazoo River near Battle Creek, Michigan. Michiganders are scrambling to stop the flow from getting into Lake Michigan, but I fear their efforts are in vain.

    According to the latest local news reports, it seems that Enbridge was slow to react to the emergency, while under reporting the actual amount of oil that was leaked into the river. Since Monday, the situation has grown even worse. Birds and other animal wildlife, coated with oil, have been found. People living along the river have been warned to evacuate the area along the river way and not to drink their well water for fear of contamination.

    1,000,000+ gallons of oil may not sound like much to some, considering the amount of oil now floating just underwater in the Gulf of Mexico, but in such a confined area – like the Kalamazoo River – that amount is devastating. As the oil continues to flow west, it will soon reach Lake Michigan, affecting the drinking water of millions of people, killing all wildlife, and despoiling the true beauty of the great lake.

    I’m really starting to believe that corporations don’t give a damn about anything other than their profits. As I stated in one of my previous blog posts (Who Put Corporations in Charge?), “…what good is money, after all, if you don’t have air to breathe, water to drink, or food to eat without fear of contamination?”

  1. 1 Is Nature Trying To Tell Us Something? « The Confluence Trackback on Jul 27th, 2010 at 8:01 pm
Comments are currently closed.

About Elizabeth


Elizabeth recently graduated from Williams College in Massachusetts. Originally from Cleveland, Ohio, she is interested in the intersection of environmentalism, urban development, public policy, and politics. She is currently working in Washington, DC.

Community Picks