Congress makes the deals, the EPA Should follow the Science

By now, it’s no secret in the environmental community that there was an unprecedented scientific report on mountaintop removal released a few days ago which found the obvious

“Mining permits are being issued despite the preponderance of scientific evidence that impacts are pervasive and irreversible and that mitigation cannot compensate for losses. Considering environmental impacts of MTM/VF, in combination with evidence that the health of people living in surface-mining regions of the central Appalachians may be compromised by mining activities, we conclude that MTM/VF permits should not be granted unless new methods can be subjected to rigorous peer-review and shown to remedy these problems.”

The report came on the heels of a new permit issued by the EPA for the blasting of the Hobet 45 mine. As the Charleston Gazette reported

“Patriot Coal will cut in half the length of streams buried by its Hobet 45 mountaintop-removal mine, but still produce nearly the same amount of coal as the company originally hoped, under a deal announced Tuesday by the Obama administration.”

So, instead of burying 6 miles of streams, we’re only going to bury 3. Jeez, 3 miles of streams is good? Have you ever run a 3 mile race? I’ve run a ton, that’s a LOT of streams getting buried. How does that abide by the Clean Water Act, as the EPA claims in their statement on the matter

These are important examples of EPA’s work to bring clarity to this process. Our role, along with the Army Corps of Engineers, is to ensure that mining companies avoid environmental degradation and protect water quality so that Appalachian communities don’t have to choose between jobs and their health,” said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. “Working closely with mining companies, our federal and state partners, and the public, our goal is to ensure Americans living in coal country are protected from environmental, health and economic damage.”

In a letter sent today, EPA advised the Army Corps of Engineers that, as a result of changes agreed to by Hobet Mining LLC after discussions with EPA, the Hobet 45 mine now meets the requirements of the Clean Water Act, clearing the way for a final permit.”

Lie

Here’s the 14 page letter the EPA sent to the Army Corp of Engineers outlining the deal

The most dangerous thing about this deal is it sets a precedent of what will likely follow for the mountaintop removal permits which the EPA put on hold because of the harm they would cause because of the violation of federal regulations. It also shows that the EPA is willing to continue spitting in the face of the science, and make political deals that should take a backseat to federal regulations they are violating. Forget about 3 miles, the EPA shouldn’t be giving out permits for any scenario where so much as a foot of streams is buried.

Cross-posted from: The Dernogalizer

2 Responses to “Congress makes the deals, the EPA Should follow the Science”


  1. 1 Morgan Jan 14th, 2010 at 12:32 am

    FWIW: the EPA public statement on this new report.

    EPA Desk Statement, 01/07/10 – “This report underscores EPA’s own scientific analysis regarding the substantial environmental, water and health impacts that result from mountaintop mining operations. EPA’s responsibility under the Clean Water Act is to ensure that mining activities do not degrade the quality of water used by communities, and we intend to ensure this requirement is met. EPA will continue to rely on the latest scientific information to inform our Clean Water Act review of mountaintop mining permits. We look forward to reviewing the details of this latest study and considering carefully its recommendations.”

  1. 1 Kennedy and Blankenship to Debate Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining « It’s Getting Hot In Here Trackback on Jan 19th, 2010 at 7:56 pm
Comments are currently closed.

About Matt


I'm currently a graduate student pursuing a Masters in Public Policy with a focus in environmental policy at the University of Maryland Public Policy Program. I'm have a Bachelors of Arts in Government and Politics from of the University of Maryland College Park. I blog largely about politics relating to energy, and the environment. I'm the former Campaign Director of UMD for Clean Energy at the University of Maryland, and am still a member. My undergraduate time in college was full of climate activism including pressuring my university to commit to and finalize a climate action plan, petitioning to get the University School System of Maryland to commit to carbon neutrality by 2050, helping pass one strongest pieces of statewide global warming legislation in the country, pressuring federal leaders to pass federal climate legislation, and leading a campaign to push a green platform in our local city council elections while mobilizing students to vote in large numbers for candidates that supported it. On top of that, I'm a big political junkie. Currently, I'm the Campaign Director for Prince Georges County Council candidate Mary Lehman. During my time as an undergraduate, I wrote bi-weekly opinion columns for our college paper The Diamondback on college, statewide, and Federal issues pertaining to energy and environment. This isn't all my life though, just like err...90% of it! I'm a long distance runner, I love watching sports, I play poker etc...but there won't be much in this blog about any of that.

Community Picks