http://www.cphpost.dk/climate/91-climate/47625-legislation-gives-police-more-power.html

And Charlie, i agree with your second point on Danish renewable initiatives, but find it impossible to see how you use these as justification. Dumbfounded if that’s actually your argument.

Meme, your comments in IGHH you have an unmatched history of baseless off-the-topic rhetoric.
One quick point (yes you’ve sucked me in to your blah, i’m weak) . “Climategate” may give you fodder for a week or so. (remember when Obama wasn’t a citizen? That was an entertaining media week too.) However, realize that why the US newsertainment stations reach for ratings during sweeps week with contrived controversy, the rest of the world is preparing for the most important global meetings since WWII. The world could careless about this and the Inhoff true squad, they are much more consumed by taking action that science deems necessary to curb climate change.

http://www.copenhagendiagnosis.org/

“The New Green, comprised of responsible environmentalists who came to their senses and joined with fellow humans”

This is the most disingenuous, inciting, and mean spirited attempt at misinformation I have seen in a while from a denialista.

Since the threat of climate change is death, this fear can’t possibly be sustainable much longer so look for the unavoidable civil war in the green world.

The right side of environmentalism will very soon be comprised of the old school Greenzis who had clung to the “death by CO2 myth” and the other side of the coin will be the new left-progressive side, The New Green, comprised of responsible environmentalists who came to their senses and joined with fellow humans on Earth to preserve, protect and respect nature and to face the progress of the future with optimism and courage. Not fear, sacrifice and denying our children their futures.

While the governments in charge may possess different levels of legitimacy, these tools are used at the UCLA regents’ meeting, on the campus of UC Berkeley (both California, USA), Tehran, London at the G-8 (which led to the death of bystander at the hands of sadistic, irresponsible police), undercover cops inciting violence in Quebec City.

I don’t condone the tactics of violence-oriented anarchists, and think some great points were raised by critiques of their activities; but authorities increasingly are criminalizing dissent all over the world.

Are we off the rails here or what? We are losing sight of our goals and doubling our efforts anyways and history will not be kind to us wishing for doom for every human on the planet. I’m seeing now that motivating by fear could have been excusable at some point but when we started promising “death” of the planet, we set ourselves up for this big fall we are experiencing. The longer we wait to abandon this CO2 mistake turned outright criminal, the less that fall will hurt environmentalism.

Admitting we were wrong has a price as we would have to turn our backs on some climate scientists and politicians and possibly fellow environmentalists with the distinct possibility of two opposing groups comprising forming post CO2 era. And the CO2 faction can’t possibly be sustainable because don’t forget, we promised death.
It’s going to be hard times for environmentalism and it looks like we earned it by spreading needless fear and losing the public’s trust in the process