It’s Getting Hot In Here

Hundreds of anti-mountaintop removal activists gathered today at the Marsh Fork Elementary in Sundial, WV, deep in the Appalachian mountains. Hundreds of pro-coal counter protesters also turned out, resulting in constant interruption of speakers and musical performers and culminating in charges of battery against a local woman who struck Goldman Environmental Prize winner Judy Bonds in the face.

Check out Climate Ground Zero for pictures and updates, Jeff Biggers always excellent article for more info.

You can check the Charleston Gazette for more info — including a brief video.

Editor’s Update: RAN is pulling together a group to continue fighting Mountain Top Removal Mining, click here if you are interested in learning more.

Co-written by Morgan Goodwin and Rob Price, members of the Avaaz Action Factory

A buzz accompanied the lunchtime rush at Longworth Cafeteria on Capitol Hill today as staffers and Reps looked at their watches and talked amongst themselves ready to witness an activist flash mob making a statement about the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES). Flash mobs are Internet organized convergences of people for a pre-organized purpose.

Over 30 young activists converged on the cafeteria, cleverly wearing the suit-and-tie disguise that is customary there, and doing nothing out of the ordinary until at precisely 12:15 pm they froze like statues. Where groups of ‘mobbers’ stood close together, frozen, reaching for ketchup, adjusting glasses, adjusting a hair clip, paused mid-stride etc, the effect was striking. At the end of two minutes of stillness one member of the ‘mob’ yelled out tick, tick, tick, a catch cry of Tck Tck Tck a global campaign for urgent climate action run by the Global Humanitarian Forum and supported by a broad coalition of climate groups.
Continue reading ‘Flash Mob for Climate Justice’

ACE’s website is in serious need of some student loving.  We want to replace some photos on our site with student artwork, and that’s where you (high school students of the world) come in!

Enter your masterpieces in ACE’s ART CONTEST by THIS WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24. Winning entries will receive $50 iTunes gift cards as a thank-you for your time and effort!  The contest is totally open-ended, we want innovative and creative designs to spice up our website!

And just in case you’re wondering what this is all about, this video pretty much sums it up:

Please email entries to kara.muraki(at)climateeducation.org. Or mail them to:

Alliance for Climate Education – Art Contest
360 22nd St. Suite 730
Oakland, CA 94612

Again, winning entries will receive $50 itunes or debit cards. Entries due by THIS WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24!

Cross-Posted from: HERE

Here in the United States, environmental groups are all over the place regarding their stance on the Waxman-Markey bill in Congress. Some say thumbs up, others say it’s better to pass it than pass nothing, and others either cannot support the bill, or want a no vote from liberal Democrats. I explain my position and rationale here. I saw an article in the NY Times today which made me think a lot about the dilemma faced here. On one hand, the 17% target in the Waxman-Markey bill will most likely not lead to a desirable treaty in Copenhagen. On the other hand, what if we show up to Copenhagen with absolutely nothing? One thing I think people overlook is the fact that Henry Waxman and Ed Markey are two of the most progressive lawmakers in the US Congress. They know energy, and they aren’t a bunch of pansies when it comes to global warming. Their bill is as strong as the political system in the US will tolerate.

Australia faces a similar situation. The Prime Minister Kevin Rudd ran on a platform that included taking action on climate change, and he’s put forth a cap and trade plan, but it’s only 5% reduction below 2000 levels by 2020.   Australia is willing to go as far as 25% if other nations step up in Copenhagen. It’s passed out of Australia’s House, but is facing huge problems in the Senate. The labor party can’t pass the law on its own, and the conservatives are vowing to fight it and kill it. However, in Australia they have a 3 party system, and the 3rd party is the Greens party, which is strongly pro-environment. If the Greens party teams up with Labour, they can pass the bill. However, the Greens are saying that 5% is too weak, and they cannot support it. Right now, their position is 25% or bust. If this position holds, we’re going to see a very comparable result as we would see in the United States if the liberal members of the Democratic party listened to their base and voted no because the bill wasn’t strong enough. Would the result be a stronger bill, or an empty sheet of paper in Copenhagen? Of course, Australia has an advantage in that if their bill fails twice, they can call elections and have the people kick out the troublemakers. Let’s see what happens to the bill. In my opinion, it will give a good indication of what would happen here. I highly recommend reading the NY Times article.

This is a historic week in the coalfields of Appalachia. A historic study quantifying the cost of coal in the form of human lives has come out (see below), and an historic action will take place in Coal River Valley on Tuesday.

And for the first time in over a generation we have legislation to end mountaintop removal proposed in both chambers of Congress and a hearing scheduled in the Senate. THURSDAY, JUNE 25, 2009 3:30 p.m.  Room 406 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building there will be a hearing to discuss MTR’s impacts on water — please come, but if you can’t, invite your Senator to attend by dialing (202) 224-3121 or email them to come out to the hearing.

And in case you’re still not sure how you feel about coal — a new study recently released has found that  coal lowers life expectancy — not a surprise to those living in coalfield communities. This study assigns a monetary value to the human life lost and finds that coal comes up $34 billion short each year. Please note that carbon capture and sequestration does NOT prevent this loss of human life.  The estimated number of lives lost each year to destructive coal practices is 1,736 and 2,889 people. Hendryx and Ahern measure that these human beings are collectively worth about $42 billion. The coal industry contributes $8 billion in revenue.

Assigning a monetary value to a human life is a cruel bottom line, but the premature death of thousands of good people — in the Appalachian region alone —  each year is crueler still. This study illustrates this tragic loss of human life for “cheap” energy in a way that coal companies and governments understand — cold hard cash.

One hopes that this study will wake our government up, that officials will realize human lives are worth even more than money, and the swift transition to a healthy, sustainable economy begins as soon as possible. More info on the study after the jump.

Continue reading ‘Coal and Mortality in Appalachia and Making History’

It can if that number is 350. That’s the safe upper limit of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere: 350 parts per million (ppm). It’s also the rallying cry of a creative campaign to raise awareness of the climate crisis and build grassroots support for the 2009 Climate Conference in Copenhagen. 350.org wants communities around the world to join together on October 24 for an International Day of Climate Action. You can join with your church, your school, or your friends and do something to visibly get the word out about 350. [See the latest video from 350.org]

Already, churches are ringing their bells 350 times and Buddhist monks have formed a huge 350 with their bodies against the backdrop of the Himalayas. People are baking 350 cakes, planting 3,500 trees, and doing whatever they can to spread the word about 350. On October 24 it’ll get even bigger with events from the Taj Mahal to the Great Barrier Reef. Over a thousand groups in almost sixty countries have signed up for what should be the biggest day of grassroots action on climate change ever. The movement’s gaining particular momentum in the developing world where the impact could be greatest.

There is a lot to like about the number 350. We are already at 389 ppm and climbing. While there is an overwhelming consensus in the scientific community that climate change is real and is already having disastrous effects on the planet, the public is still slow to jump on board. There’s been so much misinformation spread that people don’t know what to believe. 350 slices through all that. It doesn’t ask you to make a judgment call or a moral decision. It says, this is the reality we face and here’s the line in the sand. 350 doesn’t have an agenda. It doesn’t belong to one group or one language. Or one people. It’s just a number. But a number that could save the world. So do whatever you can to spread the word about 350. Bake a cake, organize an event, or write a blog post 350 words long.

Billy Parish is a co-founder of the Energy Action Coalition, a U.S. and Canadian youth climate coalition, and lives with his family in Flagstaff, AZ.

Yes, they have wireless here.

Anyway, I’m currently reeling, as heroes of our movement surround me as I write. Today I met Ed Wiley, Judy Bonds, and Larry Gibson at the Mountain Aid Festival in North Carolina. I’ve never met a superhero or rock star before, but I’m pretty sure that this is what it would feel like. Practically speechless I just chatted with them amazed at their presence in the flesh. I have never met such powerful people with unwavering passion who are at the same time so gracious. They all filled out postcards and thanked me for my work. Me? Thank me? Thank YOU, heroes.

I was talking to my mother the other day and she sputtered an astonished “why do we let that..that…mountaintop removal happen?” She was floored that the practice was in any way condoned and impressed at the action that has been taken recently. She said to me:

First they ignore you.
Then they make fun of you.
Then they try to hurt you.
Then they deal with you.
Continue reading ‘Live Blogging from Mountain Aid Festival’

Here’s a video of yesterday’s action in Twilight, WV that shut down a 20 story dragline.

Continue reading ‘Video: Mountain Action team shut down and climb 20 story dragline’

Posted by Adrian from Rainforest Action Network.

Today, RAN took the fight against dirty Tar Sands oil to Washington.

At the Capitol Hilton in Washington, DC today, the Canadian-American Business Council held a high-profile forum on energy and environment. Speakers included Canadian Prime Minister Harper’s senior energy advisor, the Premier of Manitoba, and several U.S. members of Congress – as well as senior officials from Shell, Iogen, and TransAlta. (The entire event was sponsored by ExxonMobil.) Overall, it was a big chance for some big-time greenwashing of the Tar Sands – the world’s dirtiest source of oil, and a huge threat to Indigenous rights and climate change.

And also in attendance were about thirty protestors, organized by ForestEthics and RAN, who stood outside the Hilton and protested the Canadian government’s ongoing support for dirty Tar Sands – as well as two super-sneaky RAN and ForestEthics activists, who went inside the meeting to disrupt it.

Continue reading ‘Activists Disrupt Canadian Business Conference in DC, Says “No Tar Sands”’

Congressman DeFazio & Candidate Obama

Cross-posted from Focus the Nation

After listening to Congressman Peter DeFazio (D-OR) speak today on all the reasons the Waxman-Markey cap and trade plan (ACES) is deeply flawed and that advocates for greenhouse gas reductions should be working to kill it, not pass it, I find myself almost convinced.

I’m only almost convinced because I fear the two alternatives to cap and trade – a carbon tax or Clean Water Act-style regulation – may be political nonstarters.

Congressman DeFazio (and many others) claims that carbon trading will be subject to all the same financial corruption responsible for our current economic crisis and that offsets provisions remove any incentive for real behavior change. He has co-sponsored Jim McDermott’s bill that would impose a Clean Water Act-style regulator system on global warming pollution, and hinted that a carbon tax would be better than cap and trade.

At the end of the Congressman’s speech today, I asked him this: “Waxman-Markey, even in its present severely weakened form, is going to have a tough time passing the full house. What are the chances of Congressman McDermott’s bill, Congressman Larson’s carbon tax, or even Congressman Inglis’ revenue-neutral carbon tax bill of passing the house, and how important is it to the success of an international climate treaty that the US pass something soon?” Continue reading ‘Would Obama Do It?’