The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 passed the House of Representatives Friday afternoon, with only one vote to spare. We owe Chairmen Waxman and Markey their fair due for getting this done – molding a bill that reduces US emissions 83% below 2005 levels by 2050 and that 217 other members of the house will actually vote for is impressive. Its passage is groundbreaking. But the bill itself isn’t.
As soon as we’re done congratulating Mr. Waxman, Mr. Markey and the other 217 representatives on the “yes” side, we owe it to ourselves and future generations to light a fire under them, the rest of the House, the Senate and President Obama.
ACES isn’t good enough. It isn’t smart enough. And gosh darn it, people who fully understand the science and economics of climate and energy don’t like it. But that’s the sorry state of the US Congress today – even with a handsome Democratic majority, legislators are still more concerned with dirty industry’s short-term profits than they are with the long-term feasibility of our modern economy. This bill compromises our economy and our environment for political necessity. To the credit of Chairmen Waxman and Markey, the slim margin of passage tells me they compromised almost exactly as much as was needed to get this done, and not a bit more.
The environmental community was anything but united behind this bill. While dirty industry allies like NRDC and Environmental Defense Fund celebrated the bill as the end-all, be-all policy, organizations like 1Sky, Energy Action Coalition and Focus the Nation urged passage of the bill with steep caveats – calling it out for its weaknesses and demanding improvement. To the left organizations like Greenpeace and Congressmen like Peter DeFazio (D-OR) and Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) opposed the bill, protesting its weakness and potential for financial corruption.
In order for the passage of this bill to go down in history as a step forward, it must be followed by bigger steps, bolder steps, truly transformational decisions at every level of government and in every sector of society. This won’t be easy. Conventional wisdom says the Senate is a much more conservative body than the House, with the interests of dirty energy and dirty industry even more deeply entrenched.
But there are only 100 Senators, and we need support from only 60 of them (thanks to the GOP’s willingness to toss democracy out the window and employ an always-filibuster policy). I am disappointed with the House version of the bill, but it has not shattered my confidence in humanity to the point that I am willing to give up the idea that our movement may be able to show 60 of these powerful individuals the light. And in fact we must either strengthen this bill significantly and pass it in the Senate, or kill the bill.
Allow me to repeat: If ACES does not get a whole lot stronger in the Senate, it is time to kill the bill. Kill the bill and start over, or kill the bill and let EPA use its authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Of those options, I strongly prefer the former. So how can we do it?
In my humble opinion, the first thing our movement must do is acknowledge that we have failed. We failed to pass a transformational bill through the House, and if we employ the same strategy in the Senate, we will almost certainly see an insufficient, deeply flawed piece of legislation signed into law by President Obama.
We must internalize failure, learn from our mistakes, and create a strategy for Senate engagement that changes the political landscape to line up with the science, instead of changing the bill to line up with the political landscape.
Our movement has power. Young people elected Barack Obama. Our movement is growing in every state, in every congressional district, every county and town in America. It is time to flex that power. No more asking Congress what it can handle. We need to tell Congress what we demand, build a grassroots army that can threaten the seats of Senators who are in the way, and if we don’t get a strengthened ACES through, we need to replace the Senators (and Representatives) who are dooming us to a 2 degree Celsius plus increase in global temperatures, and a world that looks like the nastier parts of the bible – fire, flood and famine.
Let’s regroup, let’s analyze what we did that worked and what didn’t, and let’s get this done in the Senate.
Alex, thanks for this summary. Yesterday was a very intense day for me, partly because of all the organizing I was doing, but partly because of the uneasy feeling I had in working so hard to pass something that falls so short. I’m working on thoughts to post here about that experience, once the digest a little more, but I hear your call to draw a line in the sand loud and clear.
Thanks to all who helped to get us to where we are, and I hope we all learned a lot so we can be 10 times louder and bolder next time.
Amen.
Are there any grumblings on who would be writing the senate bill, or when its going to happen?
We can totally do better than this bill; we have to. Maybe the youth movement will be stronger during the school year? Or maybe school will distract us from putting the necessary energy into this effort. I guess we will see.
“We must internalize failure” pretty much sums it up.
This bill is nothing but a shakedown of the American taxpayers. You know it (I hope) and I know it. Your beloved representatives have become the fabled “rebels who stormed the castle” and it’s rather disturbing to what extent denial is in play here. Sorry to throw cold water. But replacing POS’s you don’t like with the POS’s you like is where we are in this unfortunate place in history.
Exporting pollution and jobs is a failed approach. Should we reduce fossil fuels? Yes. A proper phase out should be in order. I know many of your followers don’t care about the effects on the business community.
Do so at your peril.
Just hoping y’all realize that while they pit you supposed (D)s against supposed (R)s and against we (I)’s the reality is simple.
ALL OF OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS don’t care about any of us.
READ AND ENJOY!!!!
http://leavittbrothers.com/pdfs/goldman-sachs.pdf
This and any climate bill will make the Sub-prime debacle look like a bargain to American taxpayers, American small businesses and ultimately YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN. For what….and extra .02 degrees in two decades.
I give up. I’m bolting outta the USA and taking my skills and productivity with me. And since many of those jobs leaving the US are going to South America I better get down there sooner rather than later. Go figure….AMERICANS TRYING TO GET GREEN CARDS IN OTHER COUNTRIES….ROFL. Go riddens.
We do need to recognize the failure. After all, how can we expect to improve as a movement if we refuse to learn from our mistakes. Pretending failures don’t happen is virtually guaranteeing continued progress along that path. The thing to remember is that we always have more options. Regardless of whether or not this bill (or something similar) gets signed into law, there are more ways to boost the transition to clean energy technologies than just cap-and-trade. So while ACES is a pretty substantial move, it’s not the end-game. I’m reminded of that New Yorker article a few months ago about the strategy of the underdog. The underdog wins when it refuses to play by the traditional norms or conditions of the game (which inherently favor the incumbents). So let’s take a step back and discuss how we can break out of this Sisyphusian climb to pass good climate legislation. What can we do to shift the balance of power? What alternative practices might we pursue?
“But that’s the sorry state of the US Congress today – even with a handsome Democratic majority, legislators are still more concerned with dirty industry’s short-term profits than they are with the long-term feasibility of our modern economy.”
just admit that the problem is capitalism and pushing for more policies isnt gonna end capitalism, it’ll keep the pigs with more money than you’ll ever get your hands on in power, making decisions over what’s best for your life, your body, your environment… uuuum no thanks
it’s damn past time to get beyond capitalism