<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Natural Gas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2009/06/07/natural-gas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2009/06/07/natural-gas/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Grealy</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2009/06/07/natural-gas/#comment-79307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Grealy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=11313#comment-79307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two important factors about LNG, is that it is gas that is often recovered from flaring, i.e, it comes out from an oil well and would otherwise be burnt off.  So there LNG is actually much more sustainable.  Check out the satellite  at night maps which show the massive flaring of gas from oil production off Nigeria for example,  Without LNG exports, that gas is burnt anyway, truly a waste.  LNG now gives such flaring (Indonesia and Algeria founded LNG industries based on avoiding flaring) a market.
The other thing is that LNG tankers fuel themselves from siphoning off parts of the cargo they are carrying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two important factors about LNG, is that it is gas that is often recovered from flaring, i.e, it comes out from an oil well and would otherwise be burnt off.  So there LNG is actually much more sustainable.  Check out the satellite  at night maps which show the massive flaring of gas from oil production off Nigeria for example,  Without LNG exports, that gas is burnt anyway, truly a waste.  LNG now gives such flaring (Indonesia and Algeria founded LNG industries based on avoiding flaring) a market.<br />
The other thing is that LNG tankers fuel themselves from siphoning off parts of the cargo they are carrying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Margolis</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2009/06/07/natural-gas/#comment-79303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R Margolis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=11313#comment-79303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another factor regarding LNG is cost.  South Korea went with nuclear energy in the 90&#039;s because the life cycle cost of LNG was higher.  Switching to LNG would raise energy prices and provide opportunities for alternative energy sources.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another factor regarding LNG is cost.  South Korea went with nuclear energy in the 90&#8242;s because the life cycle cost of LNG was higher.  Switching to LNG would raise energy prices and provide opportunities for alternative energy sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

