Today, Matt Wald at The New York Times wrote an article about “clean coal” that made King Coal very happy.
In the article, besides basically pulling language from press releases from coal companies about how environmentally friendly CCS will be and how it could be the greatest way to solve global warming, he also talks about the BILLIONS of dollars the same dirty energy companies received in the stimulus package to further promote this non-solution.
Luckily, our coalition partners had some things to say and fired off great letters to the editor. I’ve pasted a sampling below. You should write one too. Send your 150 word letter to letters@nytimes.com. Don’t let the Times be a mouthpiece for the coal industry in promoting lies and false solutions to the American public.
“Clean Coal technology is an expensive oxymoron and a dangerous concept to advocate on a prominent newspaper. The price of coal generated electricity was steadily rising before the recession and you can be sure it will continue to soar as soon as we dig ourselves out of this financial mess. Adding capture and sequestration technology to existing and new coal plants will only increase the price of coal generated electricity, burdening consumers and harming our competitiveness with other nations who are investing in renewable energy instead. All we are doing by throwing money at Clean Coal is propping up another failing industry that is unwilling to adapt to modern challenges. Why burden ourselves with expensive and dirty electricity when there are cheaper, cleaner alternatives like wind and solar?”
Tommaso Nicholas Boggia
Washington,D.C. Climate Advocacy Associate
Campus Progress, Center for American Progress





