RADICAL NEW AGENDA NEEDED TO ACHIEVE CLIMATE JUSTICE

Poznan statement from the Climate Justice Now! alliance
12 December 2008
Members of Climate Justice Now! – a worldwide
alliance of more than 160 organisations — have
been in Poznan for the past two weeks closely
following developments in the UN climate
negotiations.
This statement is our assessment of the
Conference of Parties (COP) 14, and articulates
our principles for achieving climate justice.
THE URGENCY OF CLIMATE JUSTICE
We will not be able to stop climate change if we
don’t change the neo-liberal and corporate-based
economy which stops us from achieving sustainable
societies. Corporate globalisation must be
stopped.
The historical responsibility for the vast
majority of greenhouse gas emissions lies with
the industrialised countries of the North. Even
though the primary responsibility of the North to
reduce emissions has been recognised in the
Convention, their production and consumption
habits continue to threaten the survival of
humanity and biodiversity. It is imperative that
the North urgently shifts to a low carbon
economy. At the same time in order to avoid the
damaging carbon intensive model of
industrialisation, the South is entitled to
resources and technology to make this transition.
We believe that any ´shared vision´ on addressing
the climate crisis must start with climate
justice and with a radical re-thinking of the
dominant development model.
Indigenous Peoples, peasant communities,
fisherfolk, and especially women in these
communities, have been living harmoniously and
sustainably with the Earth for millennia. They
are not only the most affected by climate change,
but also its false solutions, such as agrofuels,
mega-dams, genetic modification, tree plantations
and carbon offset schemes. Instead of market led
schemes, their sustainable practices should be
seen as offering the real solutions to climate
change.
UNFCCC IN CRISIS
Governments and international institutions have
to recognise that the Kyoto mechanisms have
failed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The principles of the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) – common
but differentiated responsibilities,
inter-generational equity, and polluter pays –
have been undermined in favour of market
mechanisms. The three main pillars of the Kyoto
agreement –the clean development mechanism,
joint implementation and emissions trading
schemes — have been completely ineffective in
reducing emissions, yet they continue to be at
the center of the negotiations.
Kyoto is based on carbon-trading mechanisms which
allow Northern countries to continue business as
usual by paying for “clean development” projects
in developing and transition countries. This is a
scheme designed deliberately to allow polluters
to avoid reducing emissions domestically. Clean
development mechanism projects, which are
supposed to support “sustainable development”,
include infrastructure projects such as big dams
and coal-fired power plants, and monoculture tree
plantations. Not only do these projects fail to
reduce carbon emissions, they accelerate the
privatisation and corporate take-over of the
natural world, at the expense of local
communities and Indigenous Peoples.
Proposals on the table in Poznan are heading in the same direction.
In the current negotiations, industrialised
countries continue to act on the basis of
self-interest, using all their negotiating
tactics to avoid their obligations to reduce
carbon emissions, to finance adaptation and
mitigation and transfer technology to the South.
In their pursuit of growth at any cost, many
Southern governments at the talks are trading
away the rights of their peoples and resources.
We remind them that a climate agreement is not a
trade agreement.
The main protagonists for climate stability -
Indigenous Peoples, women, peasant and family
farmers, fisherfolk, forest dependent
communities, youth, and marginalised and affected
communities in the global South and North, are
systematically excluded. Despite repeated
demands, Indigenous Peoples are not recognised as
an official party to the negotiations. Neither
are women’s voices and gender considerations
recognised and included in the process.
At the same time, private investors are circling
the talks like vultures, swooping in on every
opportunity for creating new profits. Business
and corporate lobbyists expanded their influence
and monopolized conference space at Poznan. At
least 1500 industry lobbyists were present either
as NGOs or as members of government delegations.
The Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and
Forest Degradation (REDD) scheme could create the
climate regime’s largest ever loophole, giving
Northern polluters yet another opportunity to buy
their way out of emissions reductions. With no
mention of biodiversity or Indigenous Peoples’
rights, this scheme might give a huge incentive
for countries to sell off their forests, expel
Indigenous and peasant communities, and transform
forests into tree plantations under
corporate-control. Plantations are not forests.
Privatisation and dispossession through REDD or
any other mechanisms must be stopped.
The World Bank is attempting to carve a niche in
the international climate change regime. This is
unacceptable as the Bank continues to fund
polluting industries and drive deforestation by
promoting industrial logging and agrofuels. The
Bank’s recently launched Climate Investment Funds
goes against government initiatives at the UN and
promotes dirty industries such as coal, while
forcing developing countries into the
fundamentally unequal aid framework of donor and
recipient. The World Bank Forest Carbon
Partnership Facility aiming to finance REDD
through a forest carbon mechanism serves the
interest of private companies and opens the path
for commodification of forests.
These developments are to be expected. Market
ideology has totally infiltrated the climate
talks, and the UNFCCC negotiations are now like
trade fairs hawking investment opportunities.
THE REAL SOLUTIONS
Solutions to the climate crisis will not come
from industrialised countries and big business.
Effective and enduring solutions will come from
those who have protected the environment -
Indigenous Peoples, women, peasant and family
farmers, fisherfolk, forest dependent
communities, youth and marginalised and affected
communities in the global South and North. These
include:
o Achieving low carbon economies, without
resorting to offsetting and false solutions such
as nuclear energy and “clean coal”, while
protecting the rights of those affected by the
transition, especially workers.
o Keeping fossil fuels in the ground.
o Implementing people’s food and energy sovereignty.
o Guaranteeing community control of natural resources.
o Re-localisation of production and
consumption, prioritising local markets
o Full recognition of Indigenous Peoples,
peasant and local community rights,
o Democratically controlled clean renewable energy.
o Rights based resource conservation that
enforces indigenous land rights and promotes
peoples sovereignty and public ownership over
energy, forests, seeds, land and water
o Ending deforestation and its underlying causes.
o Ending excessive consumption by elites in the North and in the South.
o Massive investment in public transport
o Ensuring gender justice by recognising
existing gender injustices and involving women in
decision making.
o Cancelling illegitimate debts claimed by
northern governments and IFIs. The illegitimacy
of these debts is underscored by the much greater
historical, social and ecological debts owed to
people of the South.
We stand at the crossroads. We call for a radical
change in direction to put climate justice and
people’s rights at the centre of these
negotiations.
In the lead-up to the 2009 COP 15 at Copenhagen
and beyond, the Climate Justice Now! alliance
will continue to monitor governments and to
mobilise social forces from the south and the
north to achieve climate justice.
Subscribe by Email!












I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader. Looking forward to reading more from you down the road!
For me, the major significance of the Poznan conference was the Gore speech when he called for people to accept that the science now is that 350 ppm is where civilization has to aim. James Hansen has been saying since December 2007 that his latest research indicates that the 450 ppm target, so often described as the borderline between “safe” and “dangerous” climate change is actually a “recipe for global disaster”.
Campaigners have had trouble with this, as the 450 ppm target was regarded by many as impossible to achieve anyway. This is no reason for anyone to deny the science, and Hansen is the best climatologist there is. At least, so says the President of the National Academy of Sciences, Ralph Cicerone. I heard many reports from Poznan where a delegate would describe how terrible it was that the governments weren’t accepting “the best science” or however else they wanted to describe it, yet these delegates weren’t accepting the best science themselves as they called on the governments to work toward achieving 450 ppm. 450 ppm by 2050 is to say lets work together for 42 years and then we can hand our descendants a planet committed to global catastrophe.
Its been a mistake, and Gore is showing real leadership as he seeks to persuade people to rectify it.
Twenty years ago, I attended the 1988 Changing Atmosphere conference in Toronto. This was before the creation of the IPCC, and before climate change was a front page issue. That conference is held to be a bit of a landmark, as it helped to put this issue on the main table for discussion.
Anyway, there, the delegates had no problem describing global warming as threatening consequences that could only be exceeded by “global nuclear war”, yet they called for no stabilization target, merely reductions that added up to “slowing this down”, which was the underlying line conference organizers wished to get out.
I was horrified. Civilization was being told all it could do was to slow down the rate at which it accelerated into planetary catastrophe that could only be compared to global nuclear war. I was the only delegate who stood, when they were about to put words into their final statement saying the changes could not be reversed, to say no, this can be reversed. No one stood against me, but no one supported me either. Still, they didn’t put those words into their final statement, and Canada’s Ambassador to the UN, the conference chair, interrupted the final plenary to ask me to stand and be recognized for my contribution. Obviously, I was saying what many of the rest of the delegates felt they couldn’t say, or what they wished there were a few billion more people like me out there saying.
If you are sailing into a planetary catastrophe, the only thing to do is advocate that the ship be turned around. This is the significance of Gore’s speech in Poznan calling for a new target. 350 ppm means the changes that have happened to the atmosphere must be reversed. Hansen has been saying the science supports this for about a year. I thought the science supported it twenty years ago. Its far past time for people to drop their denial and accept the best science.
People think they have to have a plan to achieve a goal before they accept the goal. This is a mistake. We’ll never get to where we have to go if we never accept that 350 ppm or even less is where we have to go. Stabilizing the composition and taking some greenhouse gas out of the atmosphere is the only “safe” thing to do. Its incredible that negotiations have been going on for so long and only now is a realistic target mentioned in a speech, with the target yet to be considered as necessary by any of the parties to the agreement, but there it is.
In your statement I see no reference to a target level of greenhouse gas, and I believe you should consider rectifying this. The most vital matter is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible to as low of a level as possible as humanity’s net contribution must at some point become negative, i.e gases have to come out of the atmosphere.
The Poznan conference was a big sham. Indigenous peoples – the very people who live, subsist, and steward the forests being discussed in the REDD agreement – were excluded from the talks. How can these represent the voice of the world? Once again, the UN is simply being used as a tool for big business and a way for the world powers to maintain their control over the natural resources of the world.
Climate change impacts are already affecting people and the planet. And the science shows it will get far, far worse. The biggest impacts will be on the lives and livelihoods of the poor and developing countries, especially small island states. The biggest culprits are the rich and the developed countries