<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: United Auto Workers Call for Green Shift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/12/05/7560/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/12/05/7560/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/12/05/7560/#comment-69698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Jenkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=7560#comment-69698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting.  &quot;Industrial Policy&quot; is a naughty word in most political circles, ever sense market fundamentalist dogma labeled it as a tool for socialist governments, not the good ole US of A.  But with pressing crises and clear national imperatives, the time to rehabilitate the concept may have come.  We don&#039;t necessarily need to have the kind of centralized industrial policy that you see in Japan&#039;s Ministry of Economy, Technology and Industry - which has been unabashed about using industrial policy to help Japanese industries expand into emerging markets, like the US auto market in the 70s - or the command and control economies of the Soviet states.  University of California at Davis sociologist Fred Block points out that we &lt;em&gt;already&lt;/em&gt; have a distributed set of institutions that help direct national industrial policy in what he calls a &quot;networked developmental state.&quot;  If you&#039;re interested, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greattransformations.org/21st-century-economics/201cswimming-against-the-current-the-rise-of-a-hidden-developmental-state-in-the-u-s-201d-summary&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;check out his writing here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  &#8220;Industrial Policy&#8221; is a naughty word in most political circles, ever sense market fundamentalist dogma labeled it as a tool for socialist governments, not the good ole US of A.  But with pressing crises and clear national imperatives, the time to rehabilitate the concept may have come.  We don&#8217;t necessarily need to have the kind of centralized industrial policy that you see in Japan&#8217;s Ministry of Economy, Technology and Industry &#8211; which has been unabashed about using industrial policy to help Japanese industries expand into emerging markets, like the US auto market in the 70s &#8211; or the command and control economies of the Soviet states.  University of California at Davis sociologist Fred Block points out that we <em>already</em> have a distributed set of institutions that help direct national industrial policy in what he calls a &#8220;networked developmental state.&#8221;  If you&#8217;re interested, <a href="http://www.greattransformations.org/21st-century-economics/201cswimming-against-the-current-the-rise-of-a-hidden-developmental-state-in-the-u-s-201d-summary" rel="nofollow">check out his writing here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

