Garnaut Disappoints Us All; But We Can’t Give Up Now

It is with a mix of despair, desperation and defiance that I read the news reports as they roll into my inbox and my computer screen this morning. Professor Ross Garnaut, the government’s chief climate change advisor, seems to have made a last-minute decision to recommend action based not on what the science demands, but what he judges the rest of the world will do, or not do.

He has decided we don’t have much of a chance of solving climate change because, “It is too complex. The special interests are too numerous, powerful and intense.” He recommends that Australia should pursue a global climate deal that - even he admits – puts the world at risk of the disastrous climate change consequences he set out in his draft report.

He says Australia should basically not bother fighting for my future and that of my friends, and certainly not the futures of my children or grandchildren, because “Is the international community ready to commit itself to such a strong outcome? Not yet.”

So - the international community isn’t ready (in his opinion) for aiming below 450 parts per million, so let’s not try because it will cost us too much if we take strong action alone, is essentially what he’s saying. Professor Garnaut - if your son John was at direct risk of being wiped out by the floods devastating Bihar in India right now, would you apply the same logic?

I am sitting here with tears in my eyes as I read his report and the news reaction. Aptly, I’ve come home to Newcastle for the weekend – the world’s biggest coal export port – and there is a crazy storm going on outside. Maybe it’s the planet’s reaction to Garnaut’s rubbish recommended target of 450 parts per million carbon in the atmosphere. This recommendation, and his corresponding target of 10% reduction by 2020 from 2000 levels, is so low that, as Crikey says, “the sea level will rise above it in a year”.

But now is no time for despair, despite Garnaut’s seemingly best efforts to demoralize the entire climate movement and give our government – a government elected in the world’s first climate election – an excuse to do nothing while the world’s future goes down the drain.

I can’t help but feel we should have done more this year to pressure Garnaut. I guess I’ll always feel that, even though we all work non-stop, to the point of risking our health, our friendships and anything in our lives outside climate activism. I mean, it’s 7 am on a Saturday morning and I’m already working.

But we still have time – a small but precious window of time – to influence the federal government to adopt the strongest 2020 reduction targets that are politically possible. And luckily, “politically possible” is not what Garnaut judges it to be, but the political situation that we ourselves create.

And that is why I have hope that the youth climate movement can be the one input in this crazy political system that still has the potential to change everything. And when 5,000 young people converge on Canberra, to our Parliament House, next April for Power Shift Australia, we are going to re-frame the debate and place ourselves, and our futures, in the middle of it. And when we launch this massive national youth climate campaign in the next few months, it will be impossible for any Australian – let alone any politician – to ignore the fact that young Australians will not let anyone get away with setting a target of only 10% reductions by 2020. Because that target lacks courage, vision, and any credibility with our generation.

As the Sydney Morning Herald reports and we all know, “In the past two months an intense lobbying campaign by Australia’s major greenhouse gas polluters has already threatened to gut the Rudd Government’s climate change plans. From Don Voelte, the head of Woodside, to Don Argus, chairman of BHP Billiton, the nation’s heavy hitters have taken aim at plans to put a price on greenhouse gas emissions and push Australia to produce 20 per cent of its power from renewable sources by 2020.”

This is what we’re up against and we shouldn’t fool ourselves. It will take a massive grassroots organising campaign to win this struggle, just as that is what it has taken to win every struggle in history. It will take the Australian Youth Climate Coalition, it will take GetUp, it will take the Australian Student Environment Network, every NGO in Australia, and all the tools in our toolbox. It’s everyone’s opportunity – and responsibility – to step up.

So, please read Garnaut’s report, and the news analysis, but remember that while Garnaut has given up hope, I have not, and neither has the rest of the youth climate movement, and we need your help to back us up on this and stop climate chaos.

Ps - All the victims of the flooding in northern Bihar, India are in my heart right now. At least 55 people have already lost their lives. If anyone wants to help the relief effort, my friend Abhishek Bharadwaj is organising direct assistance through a flood relief campaign. His email is bharadwajtiss [a] gmail.com.

4 Responses to “Garnaut Disappoints Us All; But We Can’t Give Up Now”


  1. 1 Whit Jones Sep 5th, 2008 at 8:16 pm

    Anna,

    I’m sorry to hear this disappointing news, but I’m glad you see the hope in the youth climate movement. The AYCC has been an inspiration for us in the U.S. and we are all eagerly waiting to see the next incredible thing coming out of Australia. Keep your head up and stick with it, we’re right by your side!

    In solidarity,

    Whit

  2. 2 Robert Merkel Sep 6th, 2008 at 2:32 am

    If you read the whole report, it’s not quite as bleak as that - though I agree it’s pretty bleak.

    The short version is that Australia’s fate is out of our hands. Essentially, even if we cut emissions to zero tomorrow, the political reality is that India and China won’t sign up to a deal that gets us to 450ppm stabilization (even though that’s still inadequate). Hence, Garnaut’s view that in the short term a 550ppm global deal is the best we can hope for.

    There are a couple of silver linings in this. The first small one is that the emissions trajectory with a 550ppm deal is - while still catastrophically bad - is less disastrous than no mitigation at all.

    The bigger one is that the hard part of the global deal will be a) setting up the machinery to make the emissions allocations and whatnot happen in the first place, and b) agree how, for a given target, allocations will be handed out to the world’s nations.

    Once that’s done, when the world comes to its senses and aims for emissions levels that actually mean saving the Murray, the Barrier Reef, the Alpine habitats, and incidentally preventing the ice sheets melting, everything will be set up to do so, and the negotiations for that deal will be relatively straightforward.

  3. 3 cterkuile Sep 6th, 2008 at 1:43 pm

    Dear Anna,

    In Europe we’re seeing a similar problem. As the EU discusses and decides on the Energy Package, it is committing to a 20% cut in GHGs by 2020 (having acknowledged the need for 25-40% in Bali). They say that they will raise this to 30% only if there is an international global deal - essentially expecting the Copenhagen COP to fail.

    We cannot let their pessimism and pathetic lack of hope bring us down. The issue is too important. The lives of those we love too valuable. The time too short.

    Hold strength in the hundreds of thousands of people all around the world who are fighting with you and working towards a world where energy is forever renewable.

    And it is us, young people, who have to hold the mirror up to decision makers. We have recognised the challenge, we know the solutions will be hard work - but we are ready. It is up to us, each one of us, to stand firm, to speak our truth and to fight for the changes we need to see.

    We do this, because we know we can.

    With love,

    Casper

  4. 4 Sally Oesterling Sep 6th, 2008 at 7:05 pm

    Garnaut’s response is utter garbage. It’s similar to Bush’s response, which is that the U.S. won’t make big efforts to lower emissions in order to abate climate change until other countries show that they will. This is also garbage, and behind it is the fact that profit is the bottom line - can’t put out the money - it will hurt the economy, jobs will be lost, industry and corporations will suffer, growth and development will suffer. All garbage. Don’t despair. Those kinds of responses challenge me to keep going and get stronger. What is right is to attempt to preserve what is left of the miraculous human-supporting climate of planet earth, and then get on with restoring it to what it was, say, when I was born 73 years ago. I want to live to be at least 100; I want to meet my great grandchildren. Those who say it is too complex or we won’t unless the others do are essentially agreeing to ecocide. To hell with ecocide. Let’s get on with it.
    Sally Oesterling
    Silver Spring, MD

Leave a Reply




About Anna


Anna Rose, 25, founded the Australian Youth Climate Coalition in November 2006. The coalition unites a diversity of youth organisations to build a generation-wide movement to solve climate change. Anna was a National Organiser for the National Union of Students in 2005 and is past National Convenor of the Australian Student Environment Network. She is a former editor of the Sydney University student paper, member of the United Nations Pacific Youth Environment Network, holds a 2008 Fellowship from the International Youth Foundation, and comes from the biggest coal export port in the world - Newcastle, Australia.

Live Updates on the Tennessee Coal Ash Disaster

Cover live the Tennessee Valley Coal Ash Disaster, with journalists, bloggers, and locals. #coalash Twitter feed

Flickr Photos

20081212_speech_037

20081212_speech_100

20081211_actions_154

20081211_actions_141

More Photos
block.png

UN Climate Updates from Poznan

Visit the Widget Gallery