<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lieberman-Warner Bill: Dirty energy in the name of climate protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/05/13/lieberman-warner-bill-dirty-energy-in-the-name-of-climate-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/05/13/lieberman-warner-bill-dirty-energy-in-the-name-of-climate-protection/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vmarx</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/05/13/lieberman-warner-bill-dirty-energy-in-the-name-of-climate-protection/#comment-69278</link>
		<dc:creator>Vmarx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4731#comment-69278</guid>
		<description>Oh, by the way.  I live next to a nuclear power plant.  No NIMBY here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, by the way.  I live next to a nuclear power plant.  No NIMBY here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vmarx</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/05/13/lieberman-warner-bill-dirty-energy-in-the-name-of-climate-protection/#comment-69277</link>
		<dc:creator>Vmarx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4731#comment-69277</guid>
		<description>So, what's wrong with nuclear power?  It's clean, safe, and produces NO carbon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what&#8217;s wrong with nuclear power?  It&#8217;s clean, safe, and produces NO carbon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elemental jim</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/05/13/lieberman-warner-bill-dirty-energy-in-the-name-of-climate-protection/#comment-65192</link>
		<dc:creator>elemental jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4731#comment-65192</guid>
		<description>Hello CB..
Do you ever get the feeling we are pounding our collective heads against a wall?
I can't believe all the poor misguided SOB's getting behind this POS bill.
If you follow my trail you will see my tale of woe started with an action alert from Care2 and their petition in support of this bill. They actually had more than one with multiple sponsors.
I emailed them all. One response.. Not really a tale of woe just very frustrating with all the delusional pro nuke supporters.
I can appreciate that you are savvy enough to follow the comments and disclose the shills.
That's pretty cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello CB..<br />
Do you ever get the feeling we are pounding our collective heads against a wall?<br />
I can&#8217;t believe all the poor misguided SOB&#8217;s getting behind this POS bill.<br />
If you follow my trail you will see my tale of woe started with an action alert from Care2 and their petition in support of this bill. They actually had more than one with multiple sponsors.<br />
I emailed them all. One response.. Not really a tale of woe just very frustrating with all the delusional pro nuke supporters.<br />
I can appreciate that you are savvy enough to follow the comments and disclose the shills.<br />
That&#8217;s pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coal Train stopped and occupied in UK! &#171; It&#8217;s Getting Hot In Here</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/05/13/lieberman-warner-bill-dirty-energy-in-the-name-of-climate-protection/#comment-65142</link>
		<dc:creator>Coal Train stopped and occupied in UK! &#171; It&#8217;s Getting Hot In Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4731#comment-65142</guid>
		<description>[...] analysis and strategy; and the policy solutions being promoted by many (such as the wholly inadequate Lieberrman-Warner bill) will simply not stop the climate crisis. If we are to beat the climate crisis and build a clean, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] analysis and strategy; and the policy solutions being promoted by many (such as the wholly inadequate Lieberrman-Warner bill) will simply not stop the climate crisis. If we are to beat the climate crisis and build a clean, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cascadia Brian</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/05/13/lieberman-warner-bill-dirty-energy-in-the-name-of-climate-protection/#comment-64816</link>
		<dc:creator>Cascadia Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 18:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4731#comment-64816</guid>
		<description>William - The opinion of science is that we need much more SERIOUS action on the climate than L-W. Simply put, if we can "never" get congress to take action needed on climate change, we can either give up on saving the planet or we'll have to explore other options. Let's focus on the latter and not get distracted by bogus solutions that will distract and delude an already less-than-fully-engaged public.

Luke - looking at your blog you are obviously an extremely pro-nuclear advocate, so I'm not going to bother trying to convert you. But for others who might be curious, here's some background on why nukes can't and shouldn't save the climate:

www.energyjustice.net/nuclear/
www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2006/jan/17/nuclearindustry.energy
www.nirs.org/mononline/nukesclimatechangereport.pdf
www.coopamerica.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/nuclear.cfm
gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/24/92132/7414</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William - The opinion of science is that we need much more SERIOUS action on the climate than L-W. Simply put, if we can &#8220;never&#8221; get congress to take action needed on climate change, we can either give up on saving the planet or we&#8217;ll have to explore other options. Let&#8217;s focus on the latter and not get distracted by bogus solutions that will distract and delude an already less-than-fully-engaged public.</p>
<p>Luke - looking at your blog you are obviously an extremely pro-nuclear advocate, so I&#8217;m not going to bother trying to convert you. But for others who might be curious, here&#8217;s some background on why nukes can&#8217;t and shouldn&#8217;t save the climate:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.energyjustice.net/nuclear/" rel="nofollow">http://www.energyjustice.net/nuclear/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2006/jan/17/nuclearindustry.energy" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2006/jan/17/nuclearindustry.energy</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nirs.org/mononline/nukesclimatechangereport.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nirs.org/mononline/nukesclimatechangereport.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://www.coopamerica.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/nuclear.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.coopamerica.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/nuclear.cfm</a><br />
gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/24/92132/7414</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North America's inaction on climate change &#124; alexlockwood.net</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/05/13/lieberman-warner-bill-dirty-energy-in-the-name-of-climate-protection/#comment-64796</link>
		<dc:creator>North America's inaction on climate change &#124; alexlockwood.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4731#comment-64796</guid>
		<description>[...] isn&#8217;t of course. But, back to the Senate, not even the environmental lobby were behind the Climate Security [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] isn&#8217;t of course. But, back to the Senate, not even the environmental lobby were behind the Climate Security [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Weston</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/05/13/lieberman-warner-bill-dirty-energy-in-the-name-of-climate-protection/#comment-64769</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Weston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4731#comment-64769</guid>
		<description>I agree that giving tradeable carbon dioxide permits worth billions of dollars to the fossil fuel industry is completely the wrong move. I agree that giving subsidies to the coal and petroleum industries is totally wrong and counterproductive.

But what's with the dogma against nuclear energy? 

Yes... there is money allocated through Liberman-Warner to low-or-no-greehouse gas emissions electricity generation technologies... and some of that money could be available to nuclear energy, just as it can be available to every other low-or-no-greehouse gas emissions electricity generation technology.

I thought we were here to discuss solutions to the problem of anthropogenic climate change? 

Nuclear energy provides the largest share by far of greenhouse gas emissions free electricity in the United States. Obviously if that's what we're seriously discussing, then rational, educated discussion of nuclear energy is important.

Nuclear energy is a greenhouse gas emissions free means of electricity generation, and its use is to be encouraged, alongside every other means of greenhouse gas emissions free electricity generation that is available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that giving tradeable carbon dioxide permits worth billions of dollars to the fossil fuel industry is completely the wrong move. I agree that giving subsidies to the coal and petroleum industries is totally wrong and counterproductive.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s with the dogma against nuclear energy? </p>
<p>Yes&#8230; there is money allocated through Liberman-Warner to low-or-no-greehouse gas emissions electricity generation technologies&#8230; and some of that money could be available to nuclear energy, just as it can be available to every other low-or-no-greehouse gas emissions electricity generation technology.</p>
<p>I thought we were here to discuss solutions to the problem of anthropogenic climate change? </p>
<p>Nuclear energy provides the largest share by far of greenhouse gas emissions free electricity in the United States. Obviously if that&#8217;s what we&#8217;re seriously discussing, then rational, educated discussion of nuclear energy is important.</p>
<p>Nuclear energy is a greenhouse gas emissions free means of electricity generation, and its use is to be encouraged, alongside every other means of greenhouse gas emissions free electricity generation that is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Greene</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/05/13/lieberman-warner-bill-dirty-energy-in-the-name-of-climate-protection/#comment-64477</link>
		<dc:creator>William Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 04:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4731#comment-64477</guid>
		<description>You need to understand that this congress is never going to be able to pass the PERFECT environmental bill. This bill would get things headed in a very positive direction. The fact that the environmental community hasn't rallied around this bill is a shame. I encourage everyone who reads this to e-mail or call your senator in support of the climate security act. We can't waste anymore time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to understand that this congress is never going to be able to pass the PERFECT environmental bill. This bill would get things headed in a very positive direction. The fact that the environmental community hasn&#8217;t rallied around this bill is a shame. I encourage everyone who reads this to e-mail or call your senator in support of the climate security act. We can&#8217;t waste anymore time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Anthony La Pietra</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/05/13/lieberman-warner-bill-dirty-energy-in-the-name-of-climate-protection/#comment-64398</link>
		<dc:creator>John Anthony La Pietra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4731#comment-64398</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have any significant details on how much what changes with the substitution of the Boxer bill (S. 3036) as an amendment for S. 2191?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have any significant details on how much what changes with the substitution of the Boxer bill (S. 3036) as an amendment for S. 2191?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Time to Start Paying Attention to John McCain&#8217;s Ideas on Climate Change : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/05/13/lieberman-warner-bill-dirty-energy-in-the-name-of-climate-protection/#comment-64341</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Time to Start Paying Attention to John McCain&#8217;s Ideas on Climate Change : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4731#comment-64341</guid>
		<description>[...] as recommended by scientists, and with the proposals supported by John McCain, it could be &#8220;the greatest greenwash of our generation.&#8221; Not only does the bill give carbon permits valued at one trillion dollars to the fossil [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as recommended by scientists, and with the proposals supported by John McCain, it could be &#8220;the greatest greenwash of our generation.&#8221; Not only does the bill give carbon permits valued at one trillion dollars to the fossil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
