<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Many Sides of Al Gore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/29/the-many-sides-of-al-gore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/29/the-many-sides-of-al-gore/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 08:12:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverfox863</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/29/the-many-sides-of-al-gore/#comment-61947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverfox863]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=4476#comment-61947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Graciously, Gore tells consumers how to change their lives to curb their carbon-gobbling ways: Switch to compact fluorescent light bulbs, use a clothesline, drive a hybrid, use renewable energy, dramatically cut back on consumption. Better still, responsible global citizens can follow Gore&#039;s example, because, as he readily points out in his speeches, he lives a &quot;carbon-neutral lifestyle.&quot; But if Al Gore is the world&#039;s role model for ecology, the planet is doomed. 

For someone who says the sky is falling, he does very little. He says he recycles and drives a hybrid. And he claims he uses renewable energy credits to offset the pollution he produces when using a private jet to promote his film. (In reality, Paramount Classics, the film&#039;s distributor, pays this.)

Public records reveal that as Gore lectures Americans on excessive consumption, he and his wife Tipper live in two properties: a 10,000-square-foot, 20-room, eight-bathroom home in Nashville, and a 4,000-square-foot home in Arlington, Va. (He also has a third home in Carthage, Tenn.) For someone rallying the planet to pursue a path of extreme personal sacrifice, Gore requires little from himself. 
Then there is the troubling matter of his energy use. In the Washington, D.C., area, utility companies offer wind energy as an alternative to traditional energy. In Nashville, similar programs exist. Utility customers must simply pay a few extra pennies per kilowatt hour, and they can continue living their carbon-neutral lifestyles knowing that they are supporting wind energy. Plenty of businesses and institutions have signed up. Even the Bush administration is using green energy for some federal office buildings, as are thousands of area residents.

But according to public records, there is no evidence that Gore has signed up to use green energy in either of his large residences. When contacted Wednesday, Gore&#039;s office confirmed as much but said the Gores were looking into making the switch at both homes. Talk about inconvenient truths. 

The issue here is not simply Gore&#039;s hypocrisy; it&#039;s a question of credibility. If he genuinely believes the apocalyptic vision he has put forth and calls for radical changes in the way other people live, why hasn&#039;t he made any radical change in his life? Giving up the zinc mine or one of his homes is not asking much, given that he wants the rest of us to radically change our lives.

Gore is not alone. Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean has said, &quot;Global warming is happening, and it threatens our very existence.&quot; The DNC website applauds the fact that Gore has &quot;tried to move people to act.&quot; Yet, astoundingly, Gore&#039;s persuasive powers have failed to convince his own party: The DNC has not signed up to pay an additional two pennies a kilowatt hour to go green. For that matter, neither has the Republican National Committee.

Maybe our very existence isn&#039;t threatened.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graciously, Gore tells consumers how to change their lives to curb their carbon-gobbling ways: Switch to compact fluorescent light bulbs, use a clothesline, drive a hybrid, use renewable energy, dramatically cut back on consumption. Better still, responsible global citizens can follow Gore&#8217;s example, because, as he readily points out in his speeches, he lives a &#8220;carbon-neutral lifestyle.&#8221; But if Al Gore is the world&#8217;s role model for ecology, the planet is doomed. </p>
<p>For someone who says the sky is falling, he does very little. He says he recycles and drives a hybrid. And he claims he uses renewable energy credits to offset the pollution he produces when using a private jet to promote his film. (In reality, Paramount Classics, the film&#8217;s distributor, pays this.)</p>
<p>Public records reveal that as Gore lectures Americans on excessive consumption, he and his wife Tipper live in two properties: a 10,000-square-foot, 20-room, eight-bathroom home in Nashville, and a 4,000-square-foot home in Arlington, Va. (He also has a third home in Carthage, Tenn.) For someone rallying the planet to pursue a path of extreme personal sacrifice, Gore requires little from himself.<br />
Then there is the troubling matter of his energy use. In the Washington, D.C., area, utility companies offer wind energy as an alternative to traditional energy. In Nashville, similar programs exist. Utility customers must simply pay a few extra pennies per kilowatt hour, and they can continue living their carbon-neutral lifestyles knowing that they are supporting wind energy. Plenty of businesses and institutions have signed up. Even the Bush administration is using green energy for some federal office buildings, as are thousands of area residents.</p>
<p>But according to public records, there is no evidence that Gore has signed up to use green energy in either of his large residences. When contacted Wednesday, Gore&#8217;s office confirmed as much but said the Gores were looking into making the switch at both homes. Talk about inconvenient truths. </p>
<p>The issue here is not simply Gore&#8217;s hypocrisy; it&#8217;s a question of credibility. If he genuinely believes the apocalyptic vision he has put forth and calls for radical changes in the way other people live, why hasn&#8217;t he made any radical change in his life? Giving up the zinc mine or one of his homes is not asking much, given that he wants the rest of us to radically change our lives.</p>
<p>Gore is not alone. Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean has said, &#8220;Global warming is happening, and it threatens our very existence.&#8221; The DNC website applauds the fact that Gore has &#8220;tried to move people to act.&#8221; Yet, astoundingly, Gore&#8217;s persuasive powers have failed to convince his own party: The DNC has not signed up to pay an additional two pennies a kilowatt hour to go green. For that matter, neither has the Republican National Committee.</p>
<p>Maybe our very existence isn&#8217;t threatened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Margolis</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/29/the-many-sides-of-al-gore/#comment-61943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R Margolis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=4476#comment-61943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read the Breakthrough Institute report via your link at the end.  I was surprised to see that it supports using all the technologies (e.g., solar, wind, carbon capture, nuclear).  Glad to see that solving the carbon problem is being looked at with fewer ideological filters (i.e., must only be solved with conservation, must be solved with only carbon sequestration, etc.).  Your comprehensive approach offers both a more practical method, but can give you allies that the more ideological sides would neglect (e.g., wind and carbon sequestration folks have a better chance working together of getting carbon regulation than being divided by social engineering goals).  

Also agree that Al Gore has underestimated the scale of the solutions needed to truly go zero carbon without excessive loss of public health and economic opportunity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read the Breakthrough Institute report via your link at the end.  I was surprised to see that it supports using all the technologies (e.g., solar, wind, carbon capture, nuclear).  Glad to see that solving the carbon problem is being looked at with fewer ideological filters (i.e., must only be solved with conservation, must be solved with only carbon sequestration, etc.).  Your comprehensive approach offers both a more practical method, but can give you allies that the more ideological sides would neglect (e.g., wind and carbon sequestration folks have a better chance working together of getting carbon regulation than being divided by social engineering goals).  </p>
<p>Also agree that Al Gore has underestimated the scale of the solutions needed to truly go zero carbon without excessive loss of public health and economic opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

