<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama: Green Coal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/21/obama-green-coal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/21/obama-green-coal/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:15:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: atve</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/21/obama-green-coal/#comment-82995</link>
		<dc:creator>atve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4483#comment-82995</guid>
		<description>The kind of policy Senator Obama is talking about would increase energy prices â€“ but for 60% of American households, the dividend check would more than offset the increased costs, INCREASING net household income.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kind of policy Senator Obama is talking about would increase energy prices â€“ but for 60% of American households, the dividend check would more than offset the increased costs, INCREASING net household income.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Friedman: Eco-Communist Wannabe &#124; Conservative Principles Now</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/21/obama-green-coal/#comment-81088</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Friedman: Eco-Communist Wannabe &#124; Conservative Principles Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4483#comment-81088</guid>
		<description>[...] The PRC is definitely working to clean up its coal production. In this it has advantages over the US in that Chinese President Hu Jintao hasnâ€™t publicly bashed his countryâ€™s coal industry and Chinese environmentalists donâ€™t loudly oppose cleaner coal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The PRC is definitely working to clean up its coal production. In this it has advantages over the US in that Chinese President Hu Jintao hasnâ€™t publicly bashed his countryâ€™s coal industry and Chinese environmentalists donâ€™t loudly oppose cleaner coal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Friedman: Eco-Communist Wannabe &#171; Prayer, News &#38; Action</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/21/obama-green-coal/#comment-81059</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Friedman: Eco-Communist Wannabe &#171; Prayer, News &#38; Action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4483#comment-81059</guid>
		<description>[...] The PRC is definitely working to clean up its coal production. In this it has advantages over the US in that Chinese President Hu Jintao hasnâ€™t publicly bashed his countryâ€™s coal industry and Chinese environmentalists donâ€™t loudly oppose cleaner coal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The PRC is definitely working to clean up its coal production. In this it has advantages over the US in that Chinese President Hu Jintao hasnâ€™t publicly bashed his countryâ€™s coal industry and Chinese environmentalists donâ€™t loudly oppose cleaner coal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bera</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/21/obama-green-coal/#comment-72258</link>
		<dc:creator>Bera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4483#comment-72258</guid>
		<description>Great quality stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great quality stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Against Fake Empire and Beyond False Solutions &#171; It&#8217;s Getting Hot In Here</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/21/obama-green-coal/#comment-68945</link>
		<dc:creator>Against Fake Empire and Beyond False Solutions &#171; It&#8217;s Getting Hot In Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4483#comment-68945</guid>
		<description>[...] see them organizing clean coal rallies at every Democratic Party event. And we&#8217;ve even heard their words spoken through the mouth of our new president: &#8220;Green Jobs in Safe Nuclear Power/Biofuels/Clean [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see them organizing clean coal rallies at every Democratic Party event. And we&#8217;ve even heard their words spoken through the mouth of our new president: &#8220;Green Jobs in Safe Nuclear Power/Biofuels/Clean [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Tinker</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/21/obama-green-coal/#comment-68873</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Tinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4483#comment-68873</guid>
		<description>Johnny,

I would feel great about a 300% increase in my electric rates -- if I got a check back each year representing my share of the revenue generated by the carbon permit auction revenues.

The kind of policy Senator Obama is talking about would increase energy prices - but for 60% of American households, the dividend check would more than offset the increased costs, INCREASING net household income.

The people who would end up paying more each year are those who use excessive amounts of electricity. Right now, we (all inhabitants of the planet) are paying for their pollution in the form of reduced air quality, increasing global temperature which will lead to reduced food production, a reduction in water supply, and possible all out chaos.

How would you like to have more money in your pocket at the end of the year, and not see the planet go to hell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnny,</p>
<p>I would feel great about a 300% increase in my electric rates &#8212; if I got a check back each year representing my share of the revenue generated by the carbon permit auction revenues.</p>
<p>The kind of policy Senator Obama is talking about would increase energy prices &#8211; but for 60% of American households, the dividend check would more than offset the increased costs, INCREASING net household income.</p>
<p>The people who would end up paying more each year are those who use excessive amounts of electricity. Right now, we (all inhabitants of the planet) are paying for their pollution in the form of reduced air quality, increasing global temperature which will lead to reduced food production, a reduction in water supply, and possible all out chaos.</p>
<p>How would you like to have more money in your pocket at the end of the year, and not see the planet go to hell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/21/obama-green-coal/#comment-68861</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 05:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4483#comment-68861</guid>
		<description>Obama will bankrupt the coal companies.  How do you feel about 300% increase in your electric rates ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama will bankrupt the coal companies.  How do you feel about 300% increase in your electric rates ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama claims he will bankbrupt Coal Industry. - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/21/obama-green-coal/#comment-68808</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama claims he will bankbrupt Coal Industry. - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4483#comment-68808</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for aggressive action to tackle climate change is critical to the survival of the human race.  Obama: Green Coal? « It&#8217;s Getting Hot In Here    hes all over the amp on the place on this issue it appears and this is all I could find on his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Tinker</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/21/obama-green-coal/#comment-68606</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Tinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4483#comment-68606</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your comments, but you are wrong.

I live in Oregon, where we get almost none of our electricity from coal. My house and my workplace, in fact, get 100% of their electricity from renewable sources - wind, hydro, and low emissions biomass. I take a bus to work, which runs on a bio-diesel blend. My computer, cell phone, lights, and everything else I use that consumes electricity is powered without coal. True, the manufacture of all the products I use required using coal-produced electricity. I never claimed we could have gotten to where we are today without coal.

The fact that we get 50% of our electricity from coal is no excuse to build more coal-burning power plants.

Science is hard to argue with. If you believe the physics that enables us to burn coal to make electricity, you have to believe the physics that says carbon emissions are heating the planet at a catastrophic rate. Not a single peer-reviewed scientific journal has published anything to the contrary.

Cutting coal completely out of the picture immediately is impractical, and maybe impossible. That said, it is critical for the survival of human civilization that we phase out our use of coal-fired plants that do not sequester their carbon emissions.

If you don&#039;t believe in global warming, that&#039;s your prerogative. However, it is not your right to destroy my future and the future of all generations to come. The only thing that makes me more mad than the fact that the old guard in power now is keeping us from stopping global warming is that you probably won&#039;t be alive when the worst consequences are felt, so I won&#039;t have the chance to say &quot;I told you so.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your comments, but you are wrong.</p>
<p>I live in Oregon, where we get almost none of our electricity from coal. My house and my workplace, in fact, get 100% of their electricity from renewable sources &#8211; wind, hydro, and low emissions biomass. I take a bus to work, which runs on a bio-diesel blend. My computer, cell phone, lights, and everything else I use that consumes electricity is powered without coal. True, the manufacture of all the products I use required using coal-produced electricity. I never claimed we could have gotten to where we are today without coal.</p>
<p>The fact that we get 50% of our electricity from coal is no excuse to build more coal-burning power plants.</p>
<p>Science is hard to argue with. If you believe the physics that enables us to burn coal to make electricity, you have to believe the physics that says carbon emissions are heating the planet at a catastrophic rate. Not a single peer-reviewed scientific journal has published anything to the contrary.</p>
<p>Cutting coal completely out of the picture immediately is impractical, and maybe impossible. That said, it is critical for the survival of human civilization that we phase out our use of coal-fired plants that do not sequester their carbon emissions.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t believe in global warming, that&#8217;s your prerogative. However, it is not your right to destroy my future and the future of all generations to come. The only thing that makes me more mad than the fact that the old guard in power now is keeping us from stopping global warming is that you probably won&#8217;t be alive when the worst consequences are felt, so I won&#8217;t have the chance to say &#8220;I told you so.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: married2acoalminer</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/03/21/obama-green-coal/#comment-68603</link>
		<dc:creator>married2acoalminer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4483#comment-68603</guid>
		<description>The person who wrote this needs to turn off everything in their house and walk to work because coal had alot to do with those things. COAL IS 50% ELECTRICITY!!!!!!!! Coal is used to form vehicles&#039; shape. Coal is used to heat peoples houses. And coal can be used for gas which means when they do that gas wont be so high and we wont have to buy gas from people who hate us. Coal is everywhere, it does make the lights come on and it definately makes your computer turn on and I suggest the ignorant person who wrote this to turn theirs off ( And all the lights and to walk to work).. Your cell phone even uses electricity. I think people are going waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyy overboard with global warming, its not as bad as you think it is. You guys are like my dad when i was little he told us not to download anything on the computer because it brings viruses. But thats the only way to get things on your computer. RIGHT NOW and for a while coal is going to 50% electricity if not more. Plus its use for other things. Even jewelry.. what i am saying is that coal is the way 50% of electricity ++  and its right here in the USA. People who dont like coal and go live in the amish country OH WAIT they might use coal to warm their houses.. See what I mean??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The person who wrote this needs to turn off everything in their house and walk to work because coal had alot to do with those things. COAL IS 50% ELECTRICITY!!!!!!!! Coal is used to form vehicles&#8217; shape. Coal is used to heat peoples houses. And coal can be used for gas which means when they do that gas wont be so high and we wont have to buy gas from people who hate us. Coal is everywhere, it does make the lights come on and it definately makes your computer turn on and I suggest the ignorant person who wrote this to turn theirs off ( And all the lights and to walk to work).. Your cell phone even uses electricity. I think people are going waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyy overboard with global warming, its not as bad as you think it is. You guys are like my dad when i was little he told us not to download anything on the computer because it brings viruses. But thats the only way to get things on your computer. RIGHT NOW and for a while coal is going to 50% electricity if not more. Plus its use for other things. Even jewelry.. what i am saying is that coal is the way 50% of electricity ++  and its right here in the USA. People who dont like coal and go live in the amish country OH WAIT they might use coal to warm their houses.. See what I mean??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
