<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Environmental Justice Movement says NO to Carbon Trading!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/19/environmental-justice-community-says-no-to-carbon-trading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/19/environmental-justice-community-says-no-to-carbon-trading/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/19/environmental-justice-community-says-no-to-carbon-trading/#comment-70620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4343#comment-70620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool RAN is in o this. Too bad they still support logging through the  FSC fake wood certification....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool RAN is in o this. Too bad they still support logging through the  FSC fake wood certification&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rising Tide North America &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Boxer-Lieberman-Warner Bill in the Senate: Dirty energy in the name of climate protection</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/19/environmental-justice-community-says-no-to-carbon-trading/#comment-64399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rising Tide North America &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Boxer-Lieberman-Warner Bill in the Senate: Dirty energy in the name of climate protection]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 01:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4343#comment-64399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the inherent problems of carbon trading, the bill gives tradeable carbon permits valued at one trillion dollars [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the inherent problems of carbon trading, the bill gives tradeable carbon permits valued at one trillion dollars [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Understory &#187; Lieberman-Warner Bill: Dirty energy in the name of climate protection</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/19/environmental-justice-community-says-no-to-carbon-trading/#comment-63766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Understory &#187; Lieberman-Warner Bill: Dirty energy in the name of climate protection]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4343#comment-63766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the inherent problems of carbon trading, the bill gives tradeable carbon permits valued at one trillion dollars [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the inherent problems of carbon trading, the bill gives tradeable carbon permits valued at one trillion dollars [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lieberman-Warner Bill: Dirty energy in the name of climate protection &#171; It&#8217;s Getting Hot In Here</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/19/environmental-justice-community-says-no-to-carbon-trading/#comment-63760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lieberman-Warner Bill: Dirty energy in the name of climate protection &#171; It&#8217;s Getting Hot In Here]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4343#comment-63760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the inherent problems of carbon trading, the bill gives tradeable carbon permits valued at one trillion dollars [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the inherent problems of carbon trading, the bill gives tradeable carbon permits valued at one trillion dollars [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California EJ Movement Issues Climate Change Declaration &#124; Your Earth Friendly Site</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/19/environmental-justice-community-says-no-to-carbon-trading/#comment-61711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[California EJ Movement Issues Climate Change Declaration &#124; Your Earth Friendly Site]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4343#comment-61711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Environmental Justice Movement says NO to Carbon Trading! ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE V. CAP-AND-TRADE [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Environmental Justice Movement says NO to Carbon Trading! ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE V. CAP-AND-TRADE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gonk</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/19/environmental-justice-community-says-no-to-carbon-trading/#comment-61426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gonk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4343#comment-61426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon trading is a great ideas.  YOu may debate it b/c it allows carbon emissions, but we need real solutions in a corporate world.  One of the biggest success stories is the current system we have where companies can trade their SO2.  Tons and tons of companies use scrubbers, flue gas desulfurization, and whatnot to reduce their SO2 so they can profit off meeting regulations.  It became viable to thus pursue cleanup from a monetary standpoint.  If CO2 is done this way, companies stand to profit from being cleaner.  How is that not viable.  Corporations only act if money was involved.  Coal is not going to go away, predictions call for the increase of it over the next few years.  Instead of a fairy-tale world of getting rid of coal right now, we need to give companies reason too.  http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/1997/emissions-1217.html

This is a strategic solution and has been imposed for So2, nox emissions, and has been hailed as a smashing success.  Companies then stand to profit from being clean, ones that arent stand to lose tons of money.  Real solution for a real world]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carbon trading is a great ideas.  YOu may debate it b/c it allows carbon emissions, but we need real solutions in a corporate world.  One of the biggest success stories is the current system we have where companies can trade their SO2.  Tons and tons of companies use scrubbers, flue gas desulfurization, and whatnot to reduce their SO2 so they can profit off meeting regulations.  It became viable to thus pursue cleanup from a monetary standpoint.  If CO2 is done this way, companies stand to profit from being cleaner.  How is that not viable.  Corporations only act if money was involved.  Coal is not going to go away, predictions call for the increase of it over the next few years.  Instead of a fairy-tale world of getting rid of coal right now, we need to give companies reason too.  <a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/1997/emissions-1217.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/1997/emissions-1217.html</a></p>
<p>This is a strategic solution and has been imposed for So2, nox emissions, and has been hailed as a smashing success.  Companies then stand to profit from being clean, ones that arent stand to lose tons of money.  Real solution for a real world</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Maiorana</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/19/environmental-justice-community-says-no-to-carbon-trading/#comment-61163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Maiorana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4343#comment-61163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Phil in questioning what is proposed instead of cap-and-trade/auction. A carbon tax plays into the same neoliberal market-based approach to the world - but with its own disadvantages. A carbon tax only appears more straight forward, in practice it is just as prone to corruption and manipulation.  It also does not contain the cap component and reaching goals with a tax is much more difficult than it seems. Multiple studies have shown that the price of gasoline has little effect on consumption. Instead, we need to approach the issue using something like CAFE. No green groups assume a cap-and-auction by itself will solve all the problems - it needs to be combined with a Renewable Electricity Standard, a moratorium on new coal, energy efficiency projects, green jobs, etc.

If the argument is that we need to go for command and control, then I&#039;m all for it (but good luck getting business on board). However, I don&#039;t agree that a tax will somehow have less capitalistic tendencies. 

The question is: What has the best chance of being approved by congress in time for it to actually matter? There are always going to be better alternatives, but we can&#039;t assume we live in a utopian society. We are working with a very real timeline which will force us to make compromises (however much we hate to admit it). I think the battle against big business can continue, but we need to make sure it doesn&#039;t compromise the goals we absolutely need to achieve. 

With that said, I don&#039;t like the neoliberal economic model and think we need to get as far away from that as possible. However, the mindset and infrastructure and mindset we are trying to change will come through smaller policies. Cap-and-Auction, strong CAFE and RES standards, combined with massive investment into renewable energy and green jobs will get us much closer to social and environmental justice than opposing the growing political will. The momentum is there, lets help shape what it creates - not isolate ourselves on the fringe. These policies are going to be created within the next few years. With progress already underway on many it is unlikely we will be able to completely shift gears and still have time to address climate change. 

We need to keep our high goals and ideals, but we also need to be strategic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Phil in questioning what is proposed instead of cap-and-trade/auction. A carbon tax plays into the same neoliberal market-based approach to the world &#8211; but with its own disadvantages. A carbon tax only appears more straight forward, in practice it is just as prone to corruption and manipulation.  It also does not contain the cap component and reaching goals with a tax is much more difficult than it seems. Multiple studies have shown that the price of gasoline has little effect on consumption. Instead, we need to approach the issue using something like CAFE. No green groups assume a cap-and-auction by itself will solve all the problems &#8211; it needs to be combined with a Renewable Electricity Standard, a moratorium on new coal, energy efficiency projects, green jobs, etc.</p>
<p>If the argument is that we need to go for command and control, then I&#8217;m all for it (but good luck getting business on board). However, I don&#8217;t agree that a tax will somehow have less capitalistic tendencies. </p>
<p>The question is: What has the best chance of being approved by congress in time for it to actually matter? There are always going to be better alternatives, but we can&#8217;t assume we live in a utopian society. We are working with a very real timeline which will force us to make compromises (however much we hate to admit it). I think the battle against big business can continue, but we need to make sure it doesn&#8217;t compromise the goals we absolutely need to achieve. </p>
<p>With that said, I don&#8217;t like the neoliberal economic model and think we need to get as far away from that as possible. However, the mindset and infrastructure and mindset we are trying to change will come through smaller policies. Cap-and-Auction, strong CAFE and RES standards, combined with massive investment into renewable energy and green jobs will get us much closer to social and environmental justice than opposing the growing political will. The momentum is there, lets help shape what it creates &#8211; not isolate ourselves on the fringe. These policies are going to be created within the next few years. With progress already underway on many it is unlikely we will be able to completely shift gears and still have time to address climate change. </p>
<p>We need to keep our high goals and ideals, but we also need to be strategic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/19/environmental-justice-community-says-no-to-carbon-trading/#comment-61160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Mitchell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4343#comment-61160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allies ... thanks for this passionate conversation. One thing I hear is a lot of anger about the abuses of the &quot;free market&quot; system. No argument there. What I&#039;m confused about is what positive alternative is being advocated. The declaration advocates a carbon tax. That&#039;s fundamentally equivalent to carbon trading -- and equally subject to political loopholes. If you&#039;re opposed to all market-based mechanisms, then ... what? I haven&#039;t seen a serious proposal that doesn&#039;t include carbon pricing, but I would be interested to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allies &#8230; thanks for this passionate conversation. One thing I hear is a lot of anger about the abuses of the &#8220;free market&#8221; system. No argument there. What I&#8217;m confused about is what positive alternative is being advocated. The declaration advocates a carbon tax. That&#8217;s fundamentally equivalent to carbon trading &#8212; and equally subject to political loopholes. If you&#8217;re opposed to all market-based mechanisms, then &#8230; what? I haven&#8217;t seen a serious proposal that doesn&#8217;t include carbon pricing, but I would be interested to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/19/environmental-justice-community-says-no-to-carbon-trading/#comment-61153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4343#comment-61153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Phil is correct in criticizing the effectiveness of a carbon tax and mistaken in his assumption that markets are capable of producing the needed changes, even in theory when you get to the nitty-gritty of neo-classical economic &quot;theory&quot; (ideology) which the plans are based on. The theories of neo-classical economics are based on assumptions which are fundamentally incompatible with representing ecological conditions. Those assumptions are that for a market to function all values have homogeneous (representable as money), quantitatively unbounded (there is no absolute limit to the amount of money in the system), and all processes must be reversible. None of these are consistent with the carbon cycle (or any of the earths specific, finite, and evolutionary systems). Economist Paul Burkett has some excellent work on this glaring contradiction. 

Furthermore &quot;Polluter Pays&quot; carries the assumption that you can undo the effects of the pollution with money, which is not often the case (a main point of the environmental justice movement). Germany was able to reduce SO2 emmission faster than the US who used a cap and trade approach by simply ordering the companies to meet the requirements. There is also the implicit assumption that we have to allow corporations to pass on costs to their consumers rather preventing that through any number of actions. E.G. New Deal type price controls, subsidies from taxing the wealthy, better yet democratically socializing energy production. Its crucial to be aware how climate interventions affect the world capitalist system&#039;s markets, but not to preserve those markets for their own sake; profit motive is a poor tool for creating social/ecological justice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Phil is correct in criticizing the effectiveness of a carbon tax and mistaken in his assumption that markets are capable of producing the needed changes, even in theory when you get to the nitty-gritty of neo-classical economic &#8220;theory&#8221; (ideology) which the plans are based on. The theories of neo-classical economics are based on assumptions which are fundamentally incompatible with representing ecological conditions. Those assumptions are that for a market to function all values have homogeneous (representable as money), quantitatively unbounded (there is no absolute limit to the amount of money in the system), and all processes must be reversible. None of these are consistent with the carbon cycle (or any of the earths specific, finite, and evolutionary systems). Economist Paul Burkett has some excellent work on this glaring contradiction. </p>
<p>Furthermore &#8220;Polluter Pays&#8221; carries the assumption that you can undo the effects of the pollution with money, which is not often the case (a main point of the environmental justice movement). Germany was able to reduce SO2 emmission faster than the US who used a cap and trade approach by simply ordering the companies to meet the requirements. There is also the implicit assumption that we have to allow corporations to pass on costs to their consumers rather preventing that through any number of actions. E.G. New Deal type price controls, subsidies from taxing the wealthy, better yet democratically socializing energy production. Its crucial to be aware how climate interventions affect the world capitalist system&#8217;s markets, but not to preserve those markets for their own sake; profit motive is a poor tool for creating social/ecological justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Smith</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/19/environmental-justice-community-says-no-to-carbon-trading/#comment-61152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/?p=4343#comment-61152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In every single example of emissions trading that has been tried so far, there has been no evidence that points to their success in effectively reducing emissions.. the reason that they are being so agressively pushed the world over is because they neatly dovetail into the economic dogma of privatisation and deregulated, &#039;free&#039;-market mania.

The California Environmental Justice Movement, that has taken such an admirably principled and pragmatic stance against the nonsense of carbon trading, is in a uniquie position to fully understand the inherent vulnerablities to corporate self-interest of such schemes through the experiences of the corruption and the environmental racism of the RECLAIM programme and SO2 trading under the Clean Air act.

The question of whether or not to auction permits is a minor distraction from the fact that such schemes are incredibly susceptible at every stage of both the design and implementation to the influence of corporate interests who will seek to use them to their own advantage.

There is no way that the creation and market-distribution of a new set of property rights in this way is ever going to either benefit the poor, or address the issue of climate change. Carbon trading is all about land grabbing and capital accumulation.. the same old issues in a new, greenwashed guise.

There are a number of other measures that can be taken in the face of climate change, at the level of the individual, communities and governments, and hair-brained carbon trading schemes serve only to crowd out the effective responses while making large profits for the biggest pollutors as they continue with business-as-usual.

This declaration is enormously inspiring and heartening to the many groups around the world (many of whom have signed the Durban Declaration on Climate Justice) who have been exposed for some years now to the corruption, oppression and ineffectiveness of the global carbon market for some years now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In every single example of emissions trading that has been tried so far, there has been no evidence that points to their success in effectively reducing emissions.. the reason that they are being so agressively pushed the world over is because they neatly dovetail into the economic dogma of privatisation and deregulated, &#8216;free&#8217;-market mania.</p>
<p>The California Environmental Justice Movement, that has taken such an admirably principled and pragmatic stance against the nonsense of carbon trading, is in a uniquie position to fully understand the inherent vulnerablities to corporate self-interest of such schemes through the experiences of the corruption and the environmental racism of the RECLAIM programme and SO2 trading under the Clean Air act.</p>
<p>The question of whether or not to auction permits is a minor distraction from the fact that such schemes are incredibly susceptible at every stage of both the design and implementation to the influence of corporate interests who will seek to use them to their own advantage.</p>
<p>There is no way that the creation and market-distribution of a new set of property rights in this way is ever going to either benefit the poor, or address the issue of climate change. Carbon trading is all about land grabbing and capital accumulation.. the same old issues in a new, greenwashed guise.</p>
<p>There are a number of other measures that can be taken in the face of climate change, at the level of the individual, communities and governments, and hair-brained carbon trading schemes serve only to crowd out the effective responses while making large profits for the biggest pollutors as they continue with business-as-usual.</p>
<p>This declaration is enormously inspiring and heartening to the many groups around the world (many of whom have signed the Durban Declaration on Climate Justice) who have been exposed for some years now to the corruption, oppression and ineffectiveness of the global carbon market for some years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

