<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Feedback Needed for &#8216;Climate Code Red&#8217;: the Book Version!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/09/your-feedback-needed-for-climate-code-red-book-version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/09/your-feedback-needed-for-climate-code-red-book-version/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cascadia Brian</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/02/09/your-feedback-needed-for-climate-code-red-book-version/#comment-61031</link>
		<dc:creator>Cascadia Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/?p=4312#comment-61031</guid>
		<description>I'll send one piece of feedback....more praise than constructive criticism for now. 

I read a LOT of climate stuff, and this is to my mind the most important publication I've read on the issues in the past 9 months (since I read Larry Lohman's "Carbon Trading: a critical conversation on privitization and power").

Although I appreciate their organizing efforts, I've been very concerned about the 80% by 2050 message that Step it Up and 1 Sky have been pushing so hard for a while now, and this seriously validates those fears. 

It's time to ask: what if the "big ask" is actually B.S.? 

I just wrote 1 Sky and told them they had some explaining to do. 

I'll post their reply (assuming it comes while this thread is still up)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll send one piece of feedback&#8230;.more praise than constructive criticism for now. </p>
<p>I read a LOT of climate stuff, and this is to my mind the most important publication I&#8217;ve read on the issues in the past 9 months (since I read Larry Lohman&#8217;s &#8220;Carbon Trading: a critical conversation on privitization and power&#8221;).</p>
<p>Although I appreciate their organizing efforts, I&#8217;ve been very concerned about the 80% by 2050 message that Step it Up and 1 Sky have been pushing so hard for a while now, and this seriously validates those fears. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to ask: what if the &#8220;big ask&#8221; is actually B.S.? </p>
<p>I just wrote 1 Sky and told them they had some explaining to do. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll post their reply (assuming it comes while this thread is still up)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
