<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still time to Stop Billions in Coal/Nuke Subsidies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/12/14/still-time-to-stop-billions-in-coalnuke-subsidies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/12/14/still-time-to-stop-billions-in-coalnuke-subsidies/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.R.L. Cowan, hydrogen-to-boron convert</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/12/14/still-time-to-stop-billions-in-coalnuke-subsidies/#comment-58408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[G.R.L. Cowan, hydrogen-to-boron convert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 03:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/12/14/still-time-to-stop-billions-in-coalnuke-subsidies/#comment-58408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guaranteeing billions in nuke loans is actually a pretty 
good idea because it gets the feds onside in new nuclear 
development.

If they can derail a new nuclear plant that would 
have given uranium miners $40 million of work per year, 
they win a lot of money, because natural gas used 
in uranium&#039;s place costs $650 million a year, both 
at current prices.

But if by that derailment they stick themselves 
with paying off billions in construction loans 
that they have guaranteed, that cancels their 
ill-gotten natural gas gains for quite a few years. 

If it doesn&#039;t pay, they won&#039;t betray the earth 
as they did in the 70s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guaranteeing billions in nuke loans is actually a pretty<br />
good idea because it gets the feds onside in new nuclear<br />
development.</p>
<p>If they can derail a new nuclear plant that would<br />
have given uranium miners $40 million of work per year,<br />
they win a lot of money, because natural gas used<br />
in uranium&#8217;s place costs $650 million a year, both<br />
at current prices.</p>
<p>But if by that derailment they stick themselves<br />
with paying off billions in construction loans<br />
that they have guaranteed, that cancels their<br />
ill-gotten natural gas gains for quite a few years. </p>
<p>If it doesn&#8217;t pay, they won&#8217;t betray the earth<br />
as they did in the 70s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eesolutions</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/12/14/still-time-to-stop-billions-in-coalnuke-subsidies/#comment-58395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eesolutions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/12/14/still-time-to-stop-billions-in-coalnuke-subsidies/#comment-58395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike, Great information!!  I&#039;m involved in local energy politics in Cheltenham, PA and I support your thinking regarding the most appropriate energy approaches.  We should reduce our energy usage through conservation and encourage more use of solar and wind energy.  Also, we should stop subsidizing the corporate energy industry - big oil and big ethanol (the extremely inefficient use of corn to produce ethanol will cause food prices to rise and exacerbate the pending global resource wars).  Let&#039;s encourage &quot;subsidy shifting&quot; from the oil industry to the alternative energy folks.  We have started an Environmental Advisory Committee in Cheltenham to work on some of these issues.

Thanks,
Tom Petersen
eesolutions.wordpress.com
www.eesolutions.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, Great information!!  I&#8217;m involved in local energy politics in Cheltenham, PA and I support your thinking regarding the most appropriate energy approaches.  We should reduce our energy usage through conservation and encourage more use of solar and wind energy.  Also, we should stop subsidizing the corporate energy industry &#8211; big oil and big ethanol (the extremely inefficient use of corn to produce ethanol will cause food prices to rise and exacerbate the pending global resource wars).  Let&#8217;s encourage &#8220;subsidy shifting&#8221; from the oil industry to the alternative energy folks.  We have started an Environmental Advisory Committee in Cheltenham to work on some of these issues.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Tom Petersen<br />
eesolutions.wordpress.com<br />
<a href="http://www.eesolutions.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.eesolutions.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Peters</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/12/14/still-time-to-stop-billions-in-coalnuke-subsidies/#comment-58393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Peters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/12/14/still-time-to-stop-billions-in-coalnuke-subsidies/#comment-58393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does corn fuel ethanol policy increase oil use and oil profit?

 * Some folks think so.

 * Clean Air Performance Professionals]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does corn fuel ethanol policy increase oil use and oil profit?</p>
<p> * Some folks think so.</p>
<p> * Clean Air Performance Professionals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

