<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Organizational Ingenuity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/11/30/organizational-ingenuity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/11/30/organizational-ingenuity/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 08:12:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juliana</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/11/30/organizational-ingenuity/#comment-57483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/11/30/organizational-ingenuity/#comment-57483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week I attended the RE-AMP meeting, a group of non-profits and foundations who come together to do strategic planning on how to fight global warming in the midwest.  Their motto, in a sense, is &quot;Think Systemically, Act Collaboratively.&quot;  There were a wide range of opinions at this conference as to how to move forward, but one phrase that described the sentiment of the group stuck with: 

Unity, not Uniformity.

We have the ability to reach consensus, even in large groups.  But we do not need to achieve consensus on all things before moving forward.  We need to work together where we can, and recognize the barriers when they arise.  I think that phrase represents the spirit of collaborative action:

Unity, not Uniformity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week I attended the RE-AMP meeting, a group of non-profits and foundations who come together to do strategic planning on how to fight global warming in the midwest.  Their motto, in a sense, is &#8220;Think Systemically, Act Collaboratively.&#8221;  There were a wide range of opinions at this conference as to how to move forward, but one phrase that described the sentiment of the group stuck with: </p>
<p>Unity, not Uniformity.</p>
<p>We have the ability to reach consensus, even in large groups.  But we do not need to achieve consensus on all things before moving forward.  We need to work together where we can, and recognize the barriers when they arise.  I think that phrase represents the spirit of collaborative action:</p>
<p>Unity, not Uniformity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandy horwitt</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/11/30/organizational-ingenuity/#comment-57482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sandy horwitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/11/30/organizational-ingenuity/#comment-57482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you know about Saul Alinsky?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you know about Saul Alinsky?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socialscientist</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/11/30/organizational-ingenuity/#comment-57480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[socialscientist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/11/30/organizational-ingenuity/#comment-57480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anybody brave enough to admit that the private auto was NEVER a good idea?

http://www.freepublictransit.org

Why will no politician touch it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody brave enough to admit that the private auto was NEVER a good idea?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freepublictransit.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.freepublictransit.org</a></p>
<p>Why will no politician touch it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

