<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Would Our Climate Policy Look Like?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/10/31/what-would-our-climate-policy-look-like/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/10/31/what-would-our-climate-policy-look-like/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 08:12:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizveazey</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/10/31/what-would-our-climate-policy-look-like/#comment-55679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lizveazey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/10/31/how-would-our-climate-policy-look-like/#comment-55679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s really important to emphasize: &quot;No Coal&quot;  not &quot;no new coal plants until they can safely dispose of climate pollution&quot;   disposing of climate pollution is a costly and unproven technology and it makes no sense to even consider it when the entire cycle of coal is so dirty.  And, means that all of our friends and allies fighting coal mining are left out of the 1 Sky initiative, which is a huge loss of a major ally.  And, all of our resources should be invested in renewable energy and efficiency and we should not be wasting our time trying to make really dirty energy a little cleaner.  It&#039;s also important to note that at Power Shift we will be lobbying around these asks except we changed &quot;no new coal plants until they can safely dispose of climate pollution&quot;  to &quot;No Coal&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s really important to emphasize: &#8220;No Coal&#8221;  not &#8220;no new coal plants until they can safely dispose of climate pollution&#8221;   disposing of climate pollution is a costly and unproven technology and it makes no sense to even consider it when the entire cycle of coal is so dirty.  And, means that all of our friends and allies fighting coal mining are left out of the 1 Sky initiative, which is a huge loss of a major ally.  And, all of our resources should be invested in renewable energy and efficiency and we should not be wasting our time trying to make really dirty energy a little cleaner.  It&#8217;s also important to note that at Power Shift we will be lobbying around these asks except we changed &#8220;no new coal plants until they can safely dispose of climate pollution&#8221;  to &#8220;No Coal&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teryn Norris</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/10/31/what-would-our-climate-policy-look-like/#comment-55580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teryn Norris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/10/31/how-would-our-climate-policy-look-like/#comment-55580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Investment&quot; and &quot;Thought breakthroughs&quot; -- nice Richard!  

Hope to see you at the reception on Saturday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Investment&#8221; and &#8220;Thought breakthroughs&#8221; &#8212; nice Richard!  </p>
<p>Hope to see you at the reception on Saturday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Margolis</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/10/31/what-would-our-climate-policy-look-like/#comment-55574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R Margolis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/10/31/how-would-our-climate-policy-look-like/#comment-55574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good list.  I would only add that any discussion on return on investment should include a comparison showing that it is favorable versus other investments (i.e., the company in question will more money with that particular energy saving as they would a competing proposal).  If they see competitive advantage, they will make the investment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good list.  I would only add that any discussion on return on investment should include a comparison showing that it is favorable versus other investments (i.e., the company in question will more money with that particular energy saving as they would a competing proposal).  If they see competitive advantage, they will make the investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

