<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ice Sheets Speak: Do or Die</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/09/10/ice-sheets-speak-do-or-die/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/09/10/ice-sheets-speak-do-or-die/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ren</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/09/10/ice-sheets-speak-do-or-die/#comment-53005</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/09/10/ice-sheets-speak-do-or-die/#comment-53005</guid>
		<description>The way I see it, the problem isn't going away until society, global and local, decide that it isn't about buying one thing to offset another, a quick fix to sweep it all under the carpet, or &lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/24/ngreen124.xml" rel="nofollow"&gt;keeping up with the earth-friendly Joneses&lt;/a&gt; by buying Organic or a biodisel car. Corporations, businesses, governments, and individuals alike need to be held tangibly accountable by governments. This isn't a problem that is going to just "go away" nor is it a problem that is going to be held at bay by a few clever green washing tactics.  People are going to have to make some serious changes, and I agree more and more that doing things on the microcosmic level isn't going to make a true &lt;a href="http://www.grist.org/feature/2007/09/04/change_redux/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;difference&lt;/a&gt;. Asking for global change through people who can make change...is the only way anything will really move in a new direction (like &lt;a href="http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for example). People have to 'really' want it. Even with all the talk about environmental progress and change, it is a trendy thought. Our longterm solution isn't concerned with polluting and saving polar bears...it is concerned with the all mighty dollar.Just look at China. There is a country that has developed rapidly economically, but didn't have the foresight to manage the waste that has come of such growth. Respiratory and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart_disease" title="Heart disease" rel="nofollow"&gt;heart diseases&lt;/a&gt; related to &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_pollution" title="Air pollution" rel="nofollow"&gt;air pollution&lt;/a&gt; are now the leading cause of death in China. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_rain" title="Acid rain" rel="nofollow"&gt;Acid rain&lt;/a&gt; falls on 30% of the country. China surpassed the United States as the &lt;a href="http://www.mnp.nl/en/service/pressreleases/2007/20070619Chinanowno1inCO2emissionsUSAinsecondposition.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;world's largest emitter of carbon dioxide&lt;/a&gt;, putting out 6,200 million tons, to America's 5,800 million. Those &lt;a href="http://www.newstarget.com/021425.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;figures&lt;/a&gt; are going to have to be cut by 25% by 2050, and by 75% by 2100 (even though they've been steadily increasing by 2% every year). I'm horrible at math...but it doesn't take much to figure out that we are already in some serious trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I see it, the problem isn&#8217;t going away until society, global and local, decide that it isn&#8217;t about buying one thing to offset another, a quick fix to sweep it all under the carpet, or <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/24/ngreen124.xml" rel="nofollow">keeping up with the earth-friendly Joneses</a> by buying Organic or a biodisel car. Corporations, businesses, governments, and individuals alike need to be held tangibly accountable by governments. This isn&#8217;t a problem that is going to just &#8220;go away&#8221; nor is it a problem that is going to be held at bay by a few clever green washing tactics.  People are going to have to make some serious changes, and I agree more and more that doing things on the microcosmic level isn&#8217;t going to make a true <a href="http://www.grist.org/feature/2007/09/04/change_redux/index.html" rel="nofollow">difference</a>. Asking for global change through people who can make change&#8230;is the only way anything will really move in a new direction (like <a href="http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/" rel="nofollow">here</a> for example). People have to &#8216;really&#8217; want it. Even with all the talk about environmental progress and change, it is a trendy thought. Our longterm solution isn&#8217;t concerned with polluting and saving polar bears&#8230;it is concerned with the all mighty dollar.Just look at China. There is a country that has developed rapidly economically, but didn&#8217;t have the foresight to manage the waste that has come of such growth. Respiratory and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart_disease" title="Heart disease" rel="nofollow">heart diseases</a> related to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_pollution" title="Air pollution" rel="nofollow">air pollution</a> are now the leading cause of death in China. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_rain" title="Acid rain" rel="nofollow">Acid rain</a> falls on 30% of the country. China surpassed the United States as the <a href="http://www.mnp.nl/en/service/pressreleases/2007/20070619Chinanowno1inCO2emissionsUSAinsecondposition.html" rel="nofollow">world&#8217;s largest emitter of carbon dioxide</a>, putting out 6,200 million tons, to America&#8217;s 5,800 million. Those <a href="http://www.newstarget.com/021425.html" rel="nofollow">figures</a> are going to have to be cut by 25% by 2050, and by 75% by 2100 (even though they&#8217;ve been steadily increasing by 2% every year). I&#8217;m horrible at math&#8230;but it doesn&#8217;t take much to figure out that we are already in some serious trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
