Australian Universities Supporting Fossil Fuel & Nukes Industry

It is with great disappointment that I today learnt of two new agreements signed between two of Australia’s leading Universities and fossil fuel bodies. The announcements come in the wake of two recent reports on the influence of the mining and fossil fuel industries on Australian universities; the Australian Student Environment Network’s report Opportunities to Waste: Australian Universities and the Nuclear Industry (www.asen.org.au/OpportunitiesToWaste), and The Australia Institute’s recent paper University Capture: Australian universities and the fossil fuel industries (www.tai.org.au).

The Sydney Morning Herald reported:

“THE University of Sydney has struck a deal with Rio Tinto to accept $21 million to establish a “sponsored chair” whose research on remotely operated mining - including work by more than 10 students - will be offered exclusively to the mining giant…The Rio Tinto Centre for Mining Automation will be “embedded” in the Australian Centre for Field Robotics, which employs about 150 university staff.

The university’s governing body met last night to endorse the move, negotiated between the acting vice-chancellor, Professor Don Nutbeam, and Technology Resources, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto. It was signed on July 5 and commits the company to provide $21 million over five years to the research centre for mining automation, to be headed by Professor Hugh Durrant-Whyte. University senate papers note: “[Technology Resources] will receive an exclusive royalty-free licence to use the results of the project in the field of mining.”


And from today’s issue of The Australian:

“THE University of Western Australia has made two senior appointments in a clear bid to indicate its commitment to the resources industry.

It has appointed noted marine scientist Alistar Robertson as a pro-vice-chancellor, as part of a “energy and minerals initiative”.

Tim Shanahan who has been CEO of the Chamber of Minerals and Energy of WA for more than six years, will become the initiative’s inaugural director. “The appointment of Tim Shanahan reflects UWA’s commitment to supporting the minerals and energy industry in WA and also the nation,” vice-chancellor Alan Robson said.”

The announcements come in the wake of two recent reports on the influence of the mining and fossil fuel industries on Australian universities; the Australian Student Environment Network’s report Opportunities to Waste: Australian Universities and the Nuclear Industry (www.asen.org.au/OpportunitiesToWaste), and The Australia Institute’s recent paper University Capture: Australian universities and the fossil fuel industries (www.tai.org.au).

One of the most frustrating things about today’s fossil fuel partnership announcements is that while Australian Universities have the potential to be a major force for good in solving our climate crisis, their governing bodies are instead choosing to perpetuate climate change by supporting environmentally destructive industries.

It is no coincidence that as federal government funding to Australian universities has been cut, universities are increasingly seeking funding from corporations. This compromises the role of the University as a relatively unbiased research institution, as corporate agendas are pushed into the University’s research and teaching priorities with each fat cheque. The ASEN Report states that the most significant element of University restructures over the 11-year term of the Coalition government has been a shift in the funding base of universities from public to private sources, namely fee-paying student and business. In 2002, then Education Minister Brendan Nelson, campaigning for the passage into legislation of his reform package, ‘Our Universities: Backing Australia’s Future,’ which greatly accelerated this trend, argued “our definition of universities should not be so narrow as to exclude one that undertakes research which is driven predominantly, but not entirely, by industry”.

Furthermore, states the ASEN report, the Australian Federal Government (notoriously against action on climate change) is using remaining levels of public funding to exercise far more explicit control over university activities. Michael Gallagher, senior figure in the Commonwealth higher education administration form 1988-2003 argues “few expected The Higher Education Support Act of 2003 to have been so prescriptive and narrow in defining the relationship between universities and the state in ‘purchaser-provider’ terms, and to have been so intrusive into areas of long standing university autonomy in Australia”.

Universities have historically been at the centre of paradigm shifts in technology and culture, such as the development of the internet. There are over 37 major Universities in Australia, each with a number of campuses. As huge institutions that use a lot of energy, they can provide an important market “tipping point” for renewable energy technology. Campuses can also showcase models of energy efficiency and environmental sustainability that can prove the feasibility of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Finally, campuses are the place where we educate and build support for the next generation of voters, politicians and business leaders who can demand that their politicians work for clean energy solutions.

Our universities don’t have to support the fossil fuel industry. Our education can help, not harm, our environment! Our Universities can choose to conserve energy, organise for more efficient systems, and support solar and wind power, bringing energy-related jobs into our communities in a way that doesn’t destroy the environment upon which our lives depend. Our Universities and governments will not take up the fight on their own. But when we organise and apply pressure to those who hold decision-making power, we can direct Institutions away from the traditions of the past towards a clean energy future rooted in climate justice. Get involved in your local campus environment collective (especially if you’re at Sydney Uni or UWA) or contact the Australian Youth Climate Coalition at aycc.national.coordinator@gmail.com.

6 Responses to “Australian Universities Supporting Fossil Fuel & Nukes Industry”


  1. 1 lizveazey Aug 8th, 2007 at 4:32 am

    Hi Anna, great post. This is an issue that really bothers me as well. I know that this cycle of money and influence goes well beyond energy, but I’m really upset by American Universities that accept money from dirty energy companies. This acceptance validates the companies, allows them to greenwash, and silences (or even buys as advocates) professors who might otherwise speak out against these companies, their practices and their plans to build new dirty energy plants.
    a few examples:
    ExxonMobil funds energy work at Stanford
    Duke Energy funds environmental school at Duke University
    Progress Energy funds environmental graduate schools at University of North Carolina (my alma mater)
    ConocoPhillips funds biofuel research at Iowa State University
    and list goes on and on and on . . .
    one of the only graduate energy programs that I’ve found not funded by dirty energy is the Energy and Resources Group program at UC-Berkeley, which also happens to be one of the top energy programs in the country.

  2. 2 jessejenkins Aug 8th, 2007 at 5:19 pm

    And all kinds of well-entrenched energy interests fund energy-related research at MIT…

    Plenty of dirty money in our Universities, both in the U.S. and Australia (and probably everywhere else too).

  3. 3 R Margolis Aug 11th, 2007 at 3:26 pm

    I realize the post is talking about industry-university relationships, the specific area of automated mining sounds good to me. Even without the mining for fuels such as coal or uranium, there will always be some mining for raw materials. The recent Utah accident with the six trapped miners is a reminder that automated mining is a safer way to get materials out of the ground.

  4. 4 Anna Rose Aug 11th, 2007 at 4:27 pm

    For me the issue is who gets to set the research agendas in our Universities? It’s not students or the ‘public good’..

  5. 5 R Margolis Aug 11th, 2007 at 8:16 pm

    At least for my alma mater, UC Santa Barbara, they do research on solar cells, low energy LEDs, and new reactor structural materials. UC Berkeley does similar in their various engineering and science departments. If there is a wide variety of research going on, the nearest thing to the ‘public good’ should work out. Also, students will have the choices open to them of what to study.

  6. 6 arif ali Nov 22nd, 2007 at 3:06 am

    i want to get admission in any fuel searching university


About Anna


Anna Rose, 25, founded the Australian Youth Climate Coalition in November 2006. The coalition unites a diversity of youth organisations to build a generation-wide movement to solve climate change. Anna was a National Organiser for the National Union of Students in 2005 and is past National Convenor of the Australian Student Environment Network. She is a former editor of the Sydney University student paper, member of the United Nations Pacific Youth Environment Network, holds a 2008 Fellowship from the International Youth Foundation, and comes from the biggest coal export port in the world - Newcastle, Australia.

Power Vote Twitter!

Follow live updates from the Power Vote Campaign and the Clean Energy Movement with the Power Vote Twitter feed

Flickr Photos

election day March Notice at Florida State

100_4229

100_4224

100_4227

More Photos
block.png