<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Halfway on CAFE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/06/23/halfway-on-cafe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/06/23/halfway-on-cafe/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Rymer</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/06/23/halfway-on-cafe/#comment-46601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carlos Rymer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 02:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/06/23/halfway-on-cafe/#comment-46601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bill is a disgrace. The increase in mpg means nothing if we&#039;ll have many more cars by 2020. After all, the automakers will likely make use of the loophole to get out of the requirement. We can&#039;t trust either Dems or Reps any longer. Government&#039;s current structure is a big hurdle for our progress. At one point, that will need to be addressed. It is 2007, and we don&#039;t have a renewable energy target. Shame on the US Congress!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bill is a disgrace. The increase in mpg means nothing if we&#8217;ll have many more cars by 2020. After all, the automakers will likely make use of the loophole to get out of the requirement. We can&#8217;t trust either Dems or Reps any longer. Government&#8217;s current structure is a big hurdle for our progress. At one point, that will need to be addressed. It is 2007, and we don&#8217;t have a renewable energy target. Shame on the US Congress!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshlynch</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/06/23/halfway-on-cafe/#comment-46596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshlynch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/06/23/halfway-on-cafe/#comment-46596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This bill got slammed by Friends of the Earth today. Check it:

Don&#039;t Believe the Hype

Josh,

The energy bill passed by the Senate was a major disappointment.

Last night the Senate passed a bill that shows us just how off the mark our nation currently is when it comes to confronting global warming.  The upcoming battle in the House will be all the more important now.

As you know, the Senate took action after monumental pressure from groups and activists like us, but the result is by no means a major green victory. Consider the unfortunate facts:

1)    The mandate for 36 billion gallons per year of &quot;renewable&quot; fuels will rely heavily on corn ethanol and imported palm oil.  Production of corn ethanol requires: massive amounts of energy, 4-5 gallons of water per gallon of fuel, vast quantities of fertilizer and land.  What&#039;s more, creating and using corn ethanol often produces just as much global warming pollution as gasoline!  Palm oil has already led to mass deforestation in Southeast Asia, with any carbon savings offset by the burning of carbon-capturing trees.  The protections in the Senate bill that take into account the threats posed by these fuels to our air, land and water are insufficient.

2)    The much ballyhooed fuel standards are not only weak, they can be waived at the auto industry&#039;s request! First off, the new standard requires automakers&#039; fleets to reach an average of 35 mpg 12 years from now, which isn&#039;t much given that hybrids on the road today average around 50 mpg.  Second, incremental improvements for each year after the 2020 target date were removed, so we could well stop at 35 mpg once we get there.  Third, we might not even get the 35 mpg in the first place, thanks to a provision that allows the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to declare the regulations null and void should the auto industry persuade it that the standards cannot be reached without financial hardship.  Finally, if this lame fuel standard gets signed into law, fuel economy legislation will likely be taken off the congressional agenda until 2020 (assuming NHTSA doesn&#039;t buckle to the auto industry before then).

3)    What does this bill not include?  Lots of good things were left out of this bill before passage, such as: mandates on use of renewable energy sources, like solar or wind; strong energy efficiency standards; and the elimination of tens of billions of dollars in tax giveaways to the wildly profitable oil and gas industry (money that would have gone to renewable resources).

While it&#039;s true that this is the best energy bill passed by the Senate in years, that is only in comparison to GOP legislation that aided and abetted global warming.  Friends of the Earth believes that legislation must instead be judged by how it addresses the ongoing global crisis.  By those standards, this bill is a bitter disappointment.

We hope to make the House bill an improvement over the Senate&#039;s, so that the final package emerging from Congress is one we can support.  We will let you know how things are developing as the House brings legislation to the floor in July.

- Friends of the Earth

PS: You can send your US Representative a message now, urging the House to do a better job than the Senate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bill got slammed by Friends of the Earth today. Check it:</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t Believe the Hype</p>
<p>Josh,</p>
<p>The energy bill passed by the Senate was a major disappointment.</p>
<p>Last night the Senate passed a bill that shows us just how off the mark our nation currently is when it comes to confronting global warming.  The upcoming battle in the House will be all the more important now.</p>
<p>As you know, the Senate took action after monumental pressure from groups and activists like us, but the result is by no means a major green victory. Consider the unfortunate facts:</p>
<p>1)    The mandate for 36 billion gallons per year of &#8220;renewable&#8221; fuels will rely heavily on corn ethanol and imported palm oil.  Production of corn ethanol requires: massive amounts of energy, 4-5 gallons of water per gallon of fuel, vast quantities of fertilizer and land.  What&#8217;s more, creating and using corn ethanol often produces just as much global warming pollution as gasoline!  Palm oil has already led to mass deforestation in Southeast Asia, with any carbon savings offset by the burning of carbon-capturing trees.  The protections in the Senate bill that take into account the threats posed by these fuels to our air, land and water are insufficient.</p>
<p>2)    The much ballyhooed fuel standards are not only weak, they can be waived at the auto industry&#8217;s request! First off, the new standard requires automakers&#8217; fleets to reach an average of 35 mpg 12 years from now, which isn&#8217;t much given that hybrids on the road today average around 50 mpg.  Second, incremental improvements for each year after the 2020 target date were removed, so we could well stop at 35 mpg once we get there.  Third, we might not even get the 35 mpg in the first place, thanks to a provision that allows the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to declare the regulations null and void should the auto industry persuade it that the standards cannot be reached without financial hardship.  Finally, if this lame fuel standard gets signed into law, fuel economy legislation will likely be taken off the congressional agenda until 2020 (assuming NHTSA doesn&#8217;t buckle to the auto industry before then).</p>
<p>3)    What does this bill not include?  Lots of good things were left out of this bill before passage, such as: mandates on use of renewable energy sources, like solar or wind; strong energy efficiency standards; and the elimination of tens of billions of dollars in tax giveaways to the wildly profitable oil and gas industry (money that would have gone to renewable resources).</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s true that this is the best energy bill passed by the Senate in years, that is only in comparison to GOP legislation that aided and abetted global warming.  Friends of the Earth believes that legislation must instead be judged by how it addresses the ongoing global crisis.  By those standards, this bill is a bitter disappointment.</p>
<p>We hope to make the House bill an improvement over the Senate&#8217;s, so that the final package emerging from Congress is one we can support.  We will let you know how things are developing as the House brings legislation to the floor in July.</p>
<p>- Friends of the Earth</p>
<p>PS: You can send your US Representative a message now, urging the House to do a better job than the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

