<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Energy Bill Update: Coal-to-Liquids Amendments Go Down in Flames</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/06/19/senate-energy-bill-update-coal-to-liquids-amendments-go-down-in-flames/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/06/19/senate-energy-bill-update-coal-to-liquids-amendments-go-down-in-flames/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 08:12:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessejenkins</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/06/19/senate-energy-bill-update-coal-to-liquids-amendments-go-down-in-flames/#comment-46945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jessejenkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/06/19/senate-energy-bill-update-coal-to-liquids-amendments-go-down-in-flames/#comment-46945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Word is that there&#039;s been an agreement reached between the Democratic leadership (which controls the committee agendas) - i.e. Dingell and Pelosi - to drop the more controversial measures from the House energy package, including coal-to-liquids, increased CAFE standards and a renewable fuels standard/low carbon fuels standard.  Also dropped were provisions that would have pre-empted states from regulating carbon emissions (thank God!).  

Stay vigilante though.  This is by no means the end of the coal industry&#039;s attempts to get federal subsidies for coal-to-liquids.  We&#039;ve won for now, but the war is still on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word is that there&#8217;s been an agreement reached between the Democratic leadership (which controls the committee agendas) &#8211; i.e. Dingell and Pelosi &#8211; to drop the more controversial measures from the House energy package, including coal-to-liquids, increased CAFE standards and a renewable fuels standard/low carbon fuels standard.  Also dropped were provisions that would have pre-empted states from regulating carbon emissions (thank God!).  </p>
<p>Stay vigilante though.  This is by no means the end of the coal industry&#8217;s attempts to get federal subsidies for coal-to-liquids.  We&#8217;ve won for now, but the war is still on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martha</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/06/19/senate-energy-bill-update-coal-to-liquids-amendments-go-down-in-flames/#comment-46910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 01:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/06/19/senate-energy-bill-update-coal-to-liquids-amendments-go-down-in-flames/#comment-46910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice writeup. I wonder if there will be a renewed attempt via the House to add coal fuel to the energy package?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice writeup. I wonder if there will be a renewed attempt via the House to add coal fuel to the energy package?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

