<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Halting Minnesota IGCC could set a precedent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/04/17/halting-minnesota-igcc-could-set-a-precedent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/04/17/halting-minnesota-igcc-could-set-a-precedent/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the Youth Climate Movement</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Den Herder-Thomas</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/04/17/halting-minnesota-igcc-could-set-a-precedent/#comment-45594</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Den Herder-Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/2007/04/17/halting-minnesota-igcc-could-set-a-precedent/#comment-45594</guid>
		<description>Re the state export issue - yes some states will accept carbon from other states for sequestration - that's actually what the Mesaba proposal was suggesting. However, long-distance carbon dioxide pipelines are neither cheap nor energy-efficient ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the state export issue - yes some states will accept carbon from other states for sequestration - that&#8217;s actually what the Mesaba proposal was suggesting. However, long-distance carbon dioxide pipelines are neither cheap nor energy-efficient &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Reitman</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/04/17/halting-minnesota-igcc-could-set-a-precedent/#comment-45593</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Reitman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/2007/04/17/halting-minnesota-igcc-could-set-a-precedent/#comment-45593</guid>
		<description>People are fighting these things all over the place.  Wherever a proposal pops up, in comes a group of concerned citizens trying to protect their air, water, land, and assets, and we have the privilege of being joined in this post by fights led by two great women, regarding the Mesaba project and Leslie from Colorado.

&lt;a href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/478" rel="nofollow"&gt;There is no such thing as clean coal&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are fighting these things all over the place.  Wherever a proposal pops up, in comes a group of concerned citizens trying to protect their air, water, land, and assets, and we have the privilege of being joined in this post by fights led by two great women, regarding the Mesaba project and Leslie from Colorado.</p>
<p><a href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/478" rel="nofollow">There is no such thing as clean coal</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Margolis</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/04/17/halting-minnesota-igcc-could-set-a-precedent/#comment-45592</link>
		<dc:creator>R Margolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/2007/04/17/halting-minnesota-igcc-could-set-a-precedent/#comment-45592</guid>
		<description>Another wrinkle in the carbon sequestration issue is: what about states that do not have suitable geology?  I read the recent release on North Carolina:

http://www.nicholas.duke.edu/institute/news-carboncapture.html

I was wondering if the neighboring states will accept carbon from another state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another wrinkle in the carbon sequestration issue is: what about states that do not have suitable geology?  I read the recent release on North Carolina:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nicholas.duke.edu/institute/news-carboncapture.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nicholas.duke.edu/institute/news-carboncapture.html</a></p>
<p>I was wondering if the neighboring states will accept carbon from another state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Glustrom</title>
		<link>http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/04/17/halting-minnesota-igcc-could-set-a-precedent/#comment-45591</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Glustrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsgettinghotinhere.wordpress.com/2007/04/17/halting-minnesota-igcc-could-set-a-precedent/#comment-45591</guid>
		<description>Hi Timothy--Thanks for the good post. At Clean Energy Action we definitely do not see coal as the future--We don't need it! Also, we don''t have nearly as much as we've been told we have which is very good news. Check out the Peak Coal report put out about 10 days ago by the Energy Watch Group in Germany. The United States reached peak coal on an energy content basis in 1998! Here is the link  http://www.energywatchgroup.org/files/Coalreport.pdf.

Take care and now we're fighting Xcel in Colorado because out here they are proposing a coal gasification plant!  We think it will be hard for them to get approval when people realize  how expensive they are and that they don't manage the carbon dioxide!

Take care. Leslie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Timothy&#8211;Thanks for the good post. At Clean Energy Action we definitely do not see coal as the future&#8211;We don&#8217;t need it! Also, we don&#8221;t have nearly as much as we&#8217;ve been told we have which is very good news. Check out the Peak Coal report put out about 10 days ago by the Energy Watch Group in Germany. The United States reached peak coal on an energy content basis in 1998! Here is the link  <a href="http://www.energywatchgroup.org/files/Coalreport.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.energywatchgroup.org/files/Coalreport.pdf</a>.</p>
<p>Take care and now we&#8217;re fighting Xcel in Colorado because out here they are proposing a coal gasification plant!  We think it will be hard for them to get approval when people realize  how expensive they are and that they don&#8217;t manage the carbon dioxide!</p>
<p>Take care. Leslie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
